vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS) and ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (ZION). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($891.0M vs $490.7M, roughly 1.8× OLYMPIC STEEL INC). ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION runs the higher net margin — 29.5% vs 0.4%, a 29.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs 4.4%). ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION produced more free cash flow last quarter ($952.0M vs $-12.9M). Over the past eight quarters, ZIONS BANCORPORATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION's revenue compounded faster (9.6% CAGR vs 0.1%).
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
Zions Bancorporation is an American national bank headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah. It operates as a national bank rather than as a bank holding company and does business under the following seven brands: Zions Bank, Amegy Bank of Texas, California Bank and Trust, National Bank of Arizona, Nevada State Bank, Vectra Bank Colorado, and the Commerce Bank of Washington.
ZEUS vs ZION — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $490.7M | $891.0M |
| Net Profit | $2.2M | $263.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.4% | 29.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.4% | 8.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.2% | 21.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | $1.77 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $891.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $490.7M | $861.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $496.5M | $838.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $492.9M | $795.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $418.8M | $820.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $470.0M | $792.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $526.3M | $777.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $526.6M | $742.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $263.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $222.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | $244.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $170.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.9M | $216.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7M | $214.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7M | $201.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.7M | $153.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 29.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.9% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 20.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.18 | $1.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.45 | $1.63 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.33 | $1.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $1.37 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.66 | $1.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.75 | $0.96 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $240.9M | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $579.1M | $7.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $89.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.42× | 0.21× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $240.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $233.2M | $970.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $235.4M | $964.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $272.5M | $950.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $197.3M | $548.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $209.2M | $546.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $196.8M | $544.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $579.1M | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $578.2M | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $574.2M | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $573.9M | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $570.6M | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $569.5M | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $563.0M | $5.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | $89.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $88.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $88.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $88.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $88.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $87.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $87.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $87.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.42× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.40× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.41× | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.47× | 0.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | 0.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | 0.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 0.09× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.4M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.9M | $952.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.6% | 106.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 13.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -2.50× | 4.08× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $41.9M | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.4M | $438.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.5M | $-62.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.4M | $179.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.6M | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.9M | $251.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.6M | $261.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $952.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.9M | $413.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8M | $-93.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.6M | $152.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | $97.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.3M | $234.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.4M | $231.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 106.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.6% | 48.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | -11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.2% | 19.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 128.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.2% | 30.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.4% | 31.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.50× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.96× | -0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.70× | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.75× | 5.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.01× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.38× | 1.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.30× | 1.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |
ZION
Segment breakdown not available.
