vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
B&G Foods, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($439.3M vs $20.2M, roughly 21.7× La Rosa Holdings Corp.). B&G Foods, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -4.4% vs -27.4%, a 23.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, La Rosa Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -4.7%). Over the past eight quarters, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (72.5% CAGR vs -12.8%).
B&G Foodsはアメリカ合衆国ニュージャージー州パーシッパニーを本拠とするブランド食品持株会社です。1996年に、1889年にマンハッタンで創業されたピクルス・レリッシュ・調味料メーカーのBloch & Guggenheimerを買収するために設立され、現在では北米の食品市場で多くの有名ブランドを擁しています。
ラローザ・ホールディングス傘下のV・ラローザ・アンド・サンズ・マカロニ社は、シチリア出身の移民ヴィンチェンツォ・ラローザによって1914年に創業されました。現在では米国屈指の有名地域ブランドへと成長し、40種以上のパスタ製品を生産し、現地で高い人気を誇っています。
BGS vs LRHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2026 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $439.3M | $20.2M |
| Net Profit | $-19.1M | $-5.5M |
| Gross Margin | 22.5% | 8.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | -24.7% |
| Net Margin | -4.4% | -27.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.7% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -356.5% | -125.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.24 | $-5.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $439.3M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $424.4M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $425.4M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $551.6M | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $461.1M | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $444.6M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $475.2M | $13.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | $578.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-19.1M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.8M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $835.0K | $-95.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-222.4M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.2M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | $2.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | 22.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.2% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | 21.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | -24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.6% | -17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | -9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.3% | -35.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | 7.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | -4.4% | -27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.3% | 337.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | -546.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -40.3% | -28.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | -12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.5% | -35.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | 0.4% | — |
| Q3 25 | $-0.24 | $-5.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | $15.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $-5.86 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.81 | $28.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $-16.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $-12.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.51 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q4 23 | $0.02 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $60.9M | $4.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.0B | $642.8K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $470.7M | $1.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $21.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 4.30× | 0.41× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q3 25 | $60.9M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.2M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.6M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.7M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.5M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | $41.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $642.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $644.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $645.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $647.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $649.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $650.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $652.4K | ||
| Q4 23 | $2.0B | — |
| Q3 25 | $470.7M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $501.4M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.1M | $-87.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $524.8M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $755.3M | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $765.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $781.2M | $5.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | $835.5M | — |
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $16.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | $3.5B | — |
| Q3 25 | 4.30× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.97× | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.85× | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.75× | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.67× | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.61× | 0.12× | ||
| Q4 23 | 2.45× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-64.6M | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-70.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 1.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $54.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q3 25 | $-64.6M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.8M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.7M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.3M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $-591.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $-803.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.1M | $-538.3K | ||
| Q4 23 | $92.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-70.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-679.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.5M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $83.3M | — |
| Q3 25 | -16.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 14.4% | — |
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 1.5% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.17× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 35.76× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BGS
| Specialty Segment | $150.5M | 34% |
| Meals Segment | $110.0M | 25% |
| Spices And Flavor Solutions Segment | $101.4M | 23% |
| Frozen And Vegetables Segment | $77.4M | 18% |
LRHC
| Real Estate Residential Brokerage Services | $16.8M | 83% |
| Transferred Over Time | $3.5M | 17% |
