vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Citizens Financial Group (CFG) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Regions Financial Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $433.0M, roughly 3.0× Citizens Financial Group). Citizens Financial Group runs the higher net margin — 121.9% vs 41.7%, a 80.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Citizens Financial Group posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.1% vs 4.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Citizens Financial Group's revenue compounded faster (8.6% CAGR vs 4.0%).
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. is an American bank holding company, headquartered in Providence, Rhode Island. The company owns the bank Citizens Bank, N.A., which operates in the U.S. states of Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Virginia, as well as Washington, DC.
Regions Financial Corporation is an American bank holding company headquartered in the Regions Center in Birmingham, Alabama. The company provides retail and commercial banking, trust, stock brokerage, and mortgage services. Its banking subsidiary, Regions Bank, operates about 2,000 automated teller machines and 1,300 branches in 15 states in the Southern and Midwestern United States.
CFG vs RF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $433.0M | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $528.0M | $534.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 55.3% |
| Net Margin | 121.9% | 41.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.1% | 4.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 31.7% | 0.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.12 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $433.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $452.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $383.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $367.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $397.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $367.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $367.0M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $528.0M | $534.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $494.0M | $569.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $436.0M | $563.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.0M | $490.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $401.0M | $534.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $382.0M | $490.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $392.0M | $501.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $334.0M | $368.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 56.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 56.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 52.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 53.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 49.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 39.2% |
| Q4 25 | 121.9% | 41.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 109.3% | 45.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 113.8% | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 101.6% | 41.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 101.0% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 104.1% | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 97.5% | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 91.0% | 31.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.12 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.05 | $0.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.92 | $0.59 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.77 | $0.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.83 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.77 | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.78 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.65 | $0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $11.2B | $4.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $26.3B | $19.0B |
| Total Assets | $226.4B | $158.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.43× | 0.22× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $11.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.3B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.4B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.9B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.1B | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.8B | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | $26.3B | $19.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.8B | $19.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2B | $18.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.9B | $18.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.3B | $17.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.9B | $18.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.9B | $17.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.8B | $17.0B |
| Q4 25 | $226.4B | $158.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $222.7B | $159.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $218.3B | $159.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $220.1B | $159.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.5B | $157.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $219.7B | $157.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $219.9B | $154.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.4B | $154.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | 0.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.51× | 0.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.56× | 0.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.55× | 0.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.58× | 0.20× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-158.0M | $-319.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | -0.30× | -0.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-158.0M | $-319.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $861.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $886.0M | $573.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-213.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $483.0M | $-220.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $834.0M | $161.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $554.0M | $396.0M |
| Q4 25 | -0.30× | -0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.43× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.03× | 1.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.57× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.20× | -0.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | 2.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.66× | 1.08× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CFG
| Capital Markets Fees | $137.0M | 32% |
| Wealth Fees | $98.0M | 23% |
| Service Chargesand Fees | $79.0M | 18% |
| Card Fees | $70.0M | 16% |
| Other | $49.0M | 11% |
RF
| Consumer Bank | $747.0M | 58% |
| Corporate Bank | $487.0M | 38% |
| Wealth Management | $47.0M | 4% |
