vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CITY HOLDING CO (CHCO) and Kingsoft Cloud Holdings Ltd (KC), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Jam City, Inc. is an American video game developer and publisher based in Culver City, California. The company was founded in 2010 by Chris DeWolfe, Colin Digiaro, Aber Whitcomb, and Josh Yguado. Jam City has nine studios located in the United States, Canada, South America, and Europe. As of 2021, it employs 825 people. Netmarble is the largest shareholder in Jam City. As of 2021, Jam City's games have 31 million monthly active users and 1.3 billion total downloads.
Kingsoft Corporation is a Chinese software company based in Beijing. Kingsoft operates four subsidiaries: Seasun for video game development, Cheetah Mobile for mobile internet apps, Kingsoft Cloud for cloud storage platforms, and Kingsoft Office Software for office software, including WPS Office. It also produced security software known as Kingsoft Security. The most popular game developed by Kingsoft is JX Online 3, launched in 2009.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $60.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $31.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 65.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 66.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 66.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 52.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 53.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.17 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.41 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.29 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.06 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.94 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.02 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.96 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.97 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
