vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Capital One (COF) and Synchrony Financial (SYF), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Synchrony Financial is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8B vs $2.4B, roughly 1.9× Capital One). Capital One runs the higher net margin — 87.2% vs 15.8%, a 71.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Capital One posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (51.9% vs 3.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Capital One's revenue compounded faster (32.7% CAGR vs 4.0%).
Capital One Financial Corporation is an American bank holding company founded on July 21, 1994, and specializing in credit cards, auto loans, banking, and savings accounts, headquartered in Tysons, Virginia, with operations primarily in the United States. It is the sixth-largest bank in the United States by total assets as of June 30, 2025, the third-largest issuer of Visa and Mastercard credit cards, and one of the largest car finance companies in the United States.
Synchrony Financial is an American consumer financial services company with its headquarters in Stamford, Connecticut, United States. The company offers consumer financing products, including credit, promotional financing and loyalty programs, installment lending to industries and consumers through Synchrony Bank, its wholly owned online bank subsidiary.
COF vs SYF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.4B | $4.8B |
| Net Profit | $2.1B | $751.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 85.8% | 20.0% |
| Net Margin | 87.2% | 15.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 51.9% | 3.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 94.7% | -3.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.33 | $2.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $4.4B |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $751.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.3B | $967.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $757.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $774.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $789.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $597.0M | $643.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | 85.8% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -321.5% | 27.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.6% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.3% | 19.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.8% |
| Q4 25 | 87.2% | 15.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 139.8% | 22.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -231.9% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 94.3% | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 68.1% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 122.8% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.7% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 92.1% | 29.4% |
| Q4 25 | $4.33 | $2.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.83 | $2.86 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.58 | $2.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.45 | $1.89 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.67 | $1.92 | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.41 | $1.94 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.38 | $1.55 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.13 | $3.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $15.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $49.9B | $15.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $113.6B | $16.8B |
| Total Assets | $669.0B | $119.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 0.91× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $15.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $20.0B |
| Q4 25 | $49.9B | $15.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.9B | $14.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.9B | $16.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.2B | $17.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.0B | $15.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.8B | $15.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.2B | $15.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.8B | $16.1B |
| Q4 25 | $113.6B | $16.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.8B | $17.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.0B | $17.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.5B | $16.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.8B | $16.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.9B | $16.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0B | $15.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $57.8B | $15.3B |
| Q4 25 | $669.0B | $119.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $661.9B | $117.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $659.0B | $120.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $493.6B | $122.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $490.1B | $119.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $486.4B | $119.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $480.0B | $120.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $481.7B | $121.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.44× | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.45× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.47× | 0.94× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.65× | 1.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.74× | 0.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.78× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.81× | 1.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.86× | 1.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $7.8B | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.4B | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 302.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 18.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 3.67× | 3.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $26.1B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $7.8B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $7.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | 302.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 384.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 307.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 290.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 129.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 424.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 405.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 198.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.67× | 3.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.87× | 2.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.65× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.32× | 2.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.23× | 3.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.63× | 3.50× | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.46× | 3.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.35× | 1.74× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COF
| Interchange Fees Contracts | $1.5B | 62% |
| Commercial Banking Segment | $930.0M | 38% |
| Service Charges And Other Customer Fees Contracts | $4.0M | 0% |
SYF
Segment breakdown not available.
