vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of 1stdibs.com, Inc. (DIBS) and Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. (GROV), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($42.4M vs $23.0M, roughly 1.8× 1stdibs.com, Inc.). Grove Collaborative Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -4.5% vs -3.7%, a 0.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, 1stdibs.com, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.9% vs -14.3%). 1stdibs.com, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.6M vs $-62.0K). Over the past eight quarters, 1stdibs.com, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (2.0% CAGR vs -11.0%).
1stdibs.com, Inc. is an American e-commerce company. It has an online marketplace, which sells luxury items such as high-end furniture for interior design, fine art and jewelry. The company has been recognized for "pushing the antiques business into the 21st century." Originally, founded in Paris, it is headquartered in New York City.
Grove Collaborative is a benefit corporation headquartered in San Francisco, with an additional office in Portland, Maine. The company makes and sells its own environmentally friendly home and personal care products under its Grove Co. brand, as well as products from other companies.
DIBS vs GROV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.0M | $42.4M |
| Net Profit | $-1.0M | $-1.6M |
| Gross Margin | 73.5% | 53.0% |
| Operating Margin | -10.1% | -3.7% |
| Net Margin | -4.5% | -3.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.9% | -14.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 80.0% | 87.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.02 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.0M | $42.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.0M | $43.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.1M | $44.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.5M | $43.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.8M | $49.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.2M | $48.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $52.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.1M | $53.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.3M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.8M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.2M | $-12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.3M | $-3.4M |
| Q4 25 | 73.5% | 53.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.3% | 53.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 71.8% | 55.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 72.4% | 53.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 72.3% | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.0% | 53.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 71.7% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.5% | 55.5% |
| Q4 25 | -10.1% | -3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.3% | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.8% | -7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.7% | -8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -30.6% | -16.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -34.9% | -14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -29.2% | -13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.3% | -1.0% |
| Q4 25 | -4.5% | -3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.0% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.5% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.3% | -8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.9% | -25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.8% | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -20.0% | -19.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.0% | -6.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.9M | $8.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $93.6M | $-17.0M |
| Total Assets | $132.1M | $53.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $22.9M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9M | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.4M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.3M | $9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.0M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.0M | $50.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.8M | $78.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.7M | $77.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $93.6M | $-17.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.0M | $-16.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.9M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.2M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $99.3M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $107.2M | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.4M | $686.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $131.0M | $7.5M |
| Q4 25 | $132.1M | $53.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $135.2M | $54.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $138.6M | $57.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $142.5M | $59.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.8M | $65.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $154.4M | $105.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $157.6M | $131.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $179.5M | $137.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.3M | $-29.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.6M | $-62.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.7% | -0.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 2.9% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-3.2M | $-8.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $4.3M | $-29.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.1M | $987.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-96.0K | $-6.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8M | $270.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0K | $750.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.1M | $-12.4M |
| Q4 25 | $3.6M | $-62.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.5M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.2M | $556.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-143.0K | $-7.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | $-95.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-44.0K | $264.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.0M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.3M | $-12.9M |
| Q4 25 | 15.7% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.8% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | -17.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.5% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.8% | -24.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 1.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DIBS
Segment breakdown not available.
GROV
| Third Party Products | $23.4M | 55% |
| Grove Brands | $19.0M | 45% |
