vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMDOCS LTD (DOX) and SILICOM LTD. (SILC), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMDOCS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $61.9M, roughly 20.2× SILICOM LTD.). AMDOCS LTD runs the higher net margin — 11.2% vs -18.5%, a 29.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SILICOM LTD. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs 1.1%).
Amdocs Limited is a multinational telecommunications technology company headquartered in Chesterfield, Missouri. The company specializes in software and services for communications, media and financial services providers and digital enterprises. Amdocs was founded in 1982 and is publicly traded on the Nasdaq stock exchange.
Silicom Ltd. is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that specializes in the design, manufacture and marketing of connectivity solutions for a range of servers and server-based systems. Its shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Silicom is a member of the RAD Group family of companies.
DOX vs SILC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2024 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $61.9M |
| Net Profit | $140.3M | $-11.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | -19.8% |
| Net Margin | 11.2% | -18.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.1% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -12.0% | 16.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.21 | $-2.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $61.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $58.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-11.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-13.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $118.5M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $148.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $159.4M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $149.6M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $129.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -22.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | 12.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -18.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -23.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | 10.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.21 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.01 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $1.26 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.32 | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $1.23 | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $1.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $42.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $117.5M |
| Total Assets | — | $152.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $42.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $117.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $127.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $152.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $150.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-3.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -5.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $18.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
