vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) and EMBRAER S.A. (EMBJ), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Leonardo DRS, Inc. is a United States–based defense contractor. Originally founded as DRS Technologies, Inc. and traded on the NYSE, it was acquired by Leonardo’s predecessor Finmeccanica in 2008. Leonardo DRS provides advanced defense technologies and systems primarily to the U.S. military.
Embraer S.A. is a Brazilian multinational aerospace corporation. It develops and manufactures aircraft and aviation systems, and provides leasing, equipment, and technical support services. Embraer is the third largest producer of civil aircraft worldwide after Boeing and Airbus. The company also has a significant presence in military aviation, ranking among the top 100 defense contractors. It is headquartered in São José dos Campos, São Paulo, with offices and operations in China, the Nether...
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $960.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $829.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $799.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $981.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $812.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $753.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $688.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $102.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.38 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.34 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.11 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
