vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KKR & Co. (KKR) and T. Rowe Price (TROW), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KKR & Co. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.7B vs $1.9B, roughly 3.0× T. Rowe Price). T. Rowe Price runs the higher net margin — 20.0% vs 23.0%, a 3.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KKR & Co. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (76.1% vs 6.0%). Over the past eight quarters, T. Rowe Price's revenue compounded faster (5.1% CAGR vs -22.9%).
KKR & Co. Inc., also known as Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., is an American global private equity and investment company. As of December 31, 2024, the firm had completed 770 private-equity investments with approximately $790 billion of total enterprise value. Its assets under management (AUM) and fee paying assets under management (FPAUM) were $553 billion and $446 billion, respectively.
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is an American publicly owned global investment management firm that offers funds, subadvisory services, separate account management, and retirement plans and services for individuals, institutions, and financial intermediaries. The firm has assets under management of more than $1.51 trillion and annual revenues of $6.48 billion as of 2023, placing it 537 on the Fortune 1000 list of the largest U.S. companies.
KKR vs TROW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.7B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $1.1B | $445.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 45.3% | 24.4% |
| Net Margin | 20.0% | 23.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 76.1% | 6.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1.8% | 1.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.98 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.7B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $445.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $900.4M | $646.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $510.1M | $505.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-185.9M | $490.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $439.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $600.5M | $603.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $667.9M | $483.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $682.2M | $573.8M |
| Q4 25 | 45.3% | 24.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.8% | 34.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.0% | 27.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | 33.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.4% | 31.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.3% | 34.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.0% | 32.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.1% | 33.5% |
| Q4 25 | 20.0% | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.3% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | 29.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 27.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.5% | 24.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.5% | 33.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.0% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.1% | 32.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.98 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.91 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.64 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.49 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $3.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $30.9B | $10.9B |
| Total Assets | $410.1B | $14.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $30.9B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.7B | $10.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2B | $10.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.5B | $10.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.7B | $10.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.1B | $10.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.7B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $21.4B | $9.8B |
| Q4 25 | $410.1B | $14.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $398.5B | $14.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $380.9B | $14.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $372.4B | $14.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $360.1B | $13.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.7B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $348.5B | $13.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $339.8B | $12.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.9B | $-18.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-85.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -4.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | -4.28× | -0.04× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-4.9B | $-18.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $609.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $438.8M | $529.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $632.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-111.7M | $-281.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $652.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $677.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $637.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-85.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $546.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $467.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $550.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-394.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $547.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $574.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $534.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 31.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 30.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.9% |
| Q4 25 | -4.28× | -0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.65× | 0.94× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.86× | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.10× | -0.64× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.12× | 1.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.03× | 1.40× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.24× | 1.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KKR
| Insurance Segment | $3.5B | 61% |
| Asset Management1 | $703.7M | 12% |
| Transaction Fee | $512.0M | 9% |
| Transaction And Monitoring Fees | $268.7M | 5% |
| Fee Credit | $230.1M | 4% |
| Other | $201.5M | 4% |
| Fixed Annuity | $77.0M | 1% |
| Asset Management Segment | $56.9M | 1% |
| Monitoring Fee | $53.5M | 1% |
| Investment Advice | $40.6M | 1% |
| Fee Related Performance | $33.6M | 1% |
| Interest Sensitive Life | $21.7M | 0% |
| Incentive Fee | $11.0M | 0% |
TROW
| Asset Management1 | $1.7B | 90% |
| Administrative Distribution Servicing And Other Fee Revenue | $141.5M | 7% |
| Other | $40.8M | 2% |
| Performance Based Advisory Fees | $14.2M | 1% |
