vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC (AWI) and James Hardie Industries plc (JHX), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Armstrong World Industries, Inc. is an international designer and manufacturer of wall and ceiling building materials based in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. As of 2014, AWI had 3,100 employees and a global manufacturing network of 17 facilities, down from 26, including nine plants dedicated to its WAVE joint venture, in 2012.
James Hardie Industries plc is an American-Irish global building materials company and the largest global manufacturer of fibre cement products. Headquartered in Ireland, it is cross-listed on the Australian and New York Stock Exchanges. Its management team currently sits in Chicago, Illinois, United States. James Hardie was plagued by several asbestos-related scandals in the 20th century.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $388.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $425.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $424.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $382.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $367.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $386.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $365.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $326.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $65.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 39.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.98 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.01 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.58 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.41 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.75 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.50 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.36 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
