vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of 别样肉客 (BYND) and La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
别样肉客 is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($61.6M vs $20.2M, roughly 3.0× La Rosa Holdings Corp.). On growth, La Rosa Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -19.7%). Over the past eight quarters, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (72.5% CAGR vs -9.7%).
Beyond Meat是一家植物基人造肉生产企业,由伊森·布朗于2009年创立,品牌简称Beyond。该公司主打各类替代动物肉的植物肉制品,产品于2012年率先在美国上市推出,目前是全球植物肉领域的知名领军品牌。
拉罗萨控股旗下的万拉罗萨父子通心粉公司由西西里移民文森佐·拉罗萨于1914年创立,发展至今已成为美国规模领先的区域知名食品品牌,可生产四十余种意面产品,在当地市场拥有较高的认可度。
BYND vs LRHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $61.6M | $20.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $-5.5M |
| Gross Margin | -11.5% | 8.4% |
| Operating Margin | -211.4% | -24.7% |
| Net Margin | — | -27.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -19.7% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -125.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.68 | $-5.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $61.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.2M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $75.0M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.7M | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.7M | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.0M | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.2M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $75.6M | $13.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-110.7M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-29.2M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-52.9M | $-95.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.6M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-34.5M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-54.4M | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | -11.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.3% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.5% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | -211.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -160.0% | -24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -46.6% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -81.8% | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -49.3% | -17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -38.2% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -36.4% | -9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -70.7% | -35.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -157.6% | -27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.0% | 337.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -77.0% | -546.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -28.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.8% | -12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -37.0% | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -71.9% | -35.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.68 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.44 | $-5.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.38 | $15.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.69 | $-5.86 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.65 | $28.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.41 | $-16.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.53 | $-12.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.84 | $-0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $203.9M | $4.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $415.7M | $642.8K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-997.0K | $1.6M |
| Total Assets | $614.7M | $21.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.41× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $203.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.3M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $103.5M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.1M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $131.9M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $121.7M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.9M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $157.9M | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | $415.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $642.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $644.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $645.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $647.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $649.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $650.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $652.4K |
| Q4 25 | $-997.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-784.1M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-677.0M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-649.5M | $-87.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-601.2M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-611.9M | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-590.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-561.4M | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | $614.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $599.7M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $691.7M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $643.8M | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $678.1M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $692.9M | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $711.2M | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $735.0M | $16.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.12× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-46.8M | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-49.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -80.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 4.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-157.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-46.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-38.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-33.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-26.1M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-29.0M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.0M | $-591.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.0M | $-803.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-31.8M | $-538.3K |
| Q4 25 | $-49.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-41.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-35.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-30.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-35.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-24.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-33.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | -80.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -59.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -46.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -44.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -43.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BYND
Segment breakdown not available.
LRHC
| Real Estate Residential Brokerage Services | $16.8M | 83% |
| Transferred Over Time | $3.5M | 17% |