vs

塞拉尼斯(CE)与孩之宝(HAS)财务数据对比。点击上方公司名可切换其他公司

塞拉尼斯的季度营收约是孩之宝的1.5倍($2.2B vs $1.4B),孩之宝净利率更高(13.9% vs 0.6%,领先13.3%),孩之宝同比增速更快(31.3% vs -7.0%),孩之宝自由现金流更多($389.5M vs $168.0M),过去两年孩之宝的营收复合增速更高(38.2% vs -8.1%)

塞拉尼斯是总部位于美国得克萨斯州欧文市的技术及特种材料企业,位列财富500强。公司是全球醋酸行业领军生产商,年产量约195万吨,占全球总产量的20%左右,同时也是全球最大的醋酸乙烯酯单体(VAM)供应商。

孩之宝是1923年12月6日成立的美国跨国玩具制造与娱乐控股企业,总部位于罗德岛州波塔基特。旗下拥有Kenner、米尔顿·布拉德利、派克兄弟、威世智等知名品牌,持有大量热门IP商标权,业务覆盖玩具生产、游戏开发、娱乐内容出品等多个领域。

CE vs HAS — 直观对比

营收规模更大
CE
CE
是对方的1.5倍
CE
$2.2B
$1.4B
HAS
营收增速更快
HAS
HAS
高出38.3%
HAS
31.3%
-7.0%
CE
净利率更高
HAS
HAS
高出13.3%
HAS
13.9%
0.6%
CE
自由现金流更多
HAS
HAS
多$221.5M
HAS
$389.5M
$168.0M
CE
两年增速更快
HAS
HAS
近两年复合增速
HAS
38.2%
-8.1%
CE

损益表 — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

指标
CE
CE
HAS
HAS
营收
$2.2B
$1.4B
净利润
$14.0M
$201.6M
毛利率
19.1%
68.7%
营业利润率
4.0%
20.6%
净利率
0.6%
13.9%
营收同比
-7.0%
31.3%
净利润同比
100.7%
687.8%
每股收益(稀释后)
$0.13
$1.46

绿色 = 该指标领先。财年不对齐时期间可能不同

8季度营收与利润趋势

并排季度历史对比,按日历期对齐,财年错位的公司也能正确匹配

营收
CE
CE
HAS
HAS
Q4 25
$2.2B
$1.4B
Q3 25
$2.4B
$1.4B
Q2 25
$2.5B
$980.8M
Q1 25
$2.4B
$887.1M
Q4 24
$2.4B
$1.1B
Q3 24
$2.6B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$2.7B
$995.3M
Q1 24
$2.6B
$757.3M
净利润
CE
CE
HAS
HAS
Q4 25
$14.0M
$201.6M
Q3 25
$-1.4B
$233.2M
Q2 25
$199.0M
$-855.8M
Q1 25
$-21.0M
$98.6M
Q4 24
$-1.9B
$-34.3M
Q3 24
$116.0M
$223.2M
Q2 24
$155.0M
$138.5M
Q1 24
$121.0M
$58.2M
毛利率
CE
CE
HAS
HAS
Q4 25
19.1%
68.7%
Q3 25
21.5%
70.1%
Q2 25
21.1%
77.0%
Q1 25
19.9%
76.9%
Q4 24
22.7%
67.4%
Q3 24
23.5%
70.4%
Q2 24
24.2%
76.1%
Q1 24
21.2%
73.0%
营业利润率
CE
CE
HAS
HAS
Q4 25
4.0%
20.6%
Q3 25
-52.7%
24.6%
Q2 25
9.2%
-81.4%
Q1 25
7.0%
19.2%
Q4 24
-59.3%
5.4%
Q3 24
9.4%
23.6%
Q2 24
9.4%
21.3%
Q1 24
8.0%
15.3%
净利率
CE
CE
HAS
HAS
Q4 25
0.6%
13.9%
Q3 25
-56.1%
16.8%
Q2 25
7.9%
-87.3%
Q1 25
-0.9%
11.1%
Q4 24
-80.8%
-3.1%
Q3 24
4.4%
17.4%
Q2 24
5.8%
13.9%
Q1 24
4.6%
7.7%
每股收益(稀释后)
CE
CE
HAS
HAS
Q4 25
$0.13
$1.46
Q3 25
$-12.39
$1.64
Q2 25
$1.81
$-6.10
Q1 25
$-0.19
$0.70
Q4 24
$-17.50
$-0.25
Q3 24
$1.06
$1.59
Q2 24
$1.41
$0.99
Q1 24
$1.10
$0.42

资产负债表与财务实力

最新季度各公司的流动性、杠杆与账面价值一览

指标
CE
CE
HAS
HAS
现金及短期投资手头流动性
总债务越低越好
$11.4B
股东权益账面价值
$4.0B
$565.5M
总资产
$21.7B
$5.6B
负债/权益比越低杠杆越低
2.81×

8季度趋势,按日历期对齐

总债务
CE
CE
HAS
HAS
Q4 25
$11.4B
Q3 25
$11.7B
Q2 25
$12.7B
Q1 25
$12.4B
Q4 24
$11.1B
Q3 24
$11.3B
Q2 24
$11.1B
Q1 24
$11.0B
股东权益
CE
CE
HAS
HAS
Q4 25
$4.0B
$565.5M
Q3 25
$4.0B
$433.8M
Q2 25
$5.3B
$269.7M
Q1 25
$5.2B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$5.2B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$7.3B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$7.2B
$1.2B
Q1 24
$7.1B
$1.0B
总资产
CE
CE
HAS
HAS
Q4 25
$21.7B
$5.6B
Q3 25
$22.2B
$5.5B
Q2 25
$23.7B
$5.2B
Q1 25
$23.2B
$6.0B
Q4 24
$22.9B
$6.3B
Q3 24
$25.9B
$7.2B
Q2 24
$25.8B
$6.9B
Q1 24
$26.0B
$6.2B
负债/权益比
CE
CE
HAS
HAS
Q4 25
2.81×
Q3 25
2.95×
Q2 25
2.41×
Q1 25
2.39×
Q4 24
2.14×
Q3 24
1.56×
Q2 24
1.54×
Q1 24
1.56×

现金流与资本效率

扣除再投资后实际产生的现金。现金流比净利润更难造假

指标
CE
CE
HAS
HAS
经营现金流最新季度
$252.0M
$403.2M
自由现金流经营现金流 - 资本支出
$168.0M
$389.5M
自由现金流率自由现金流/营收
7.6%
26.9%
资本支出强度资本支出/营收
3.8%
0.9%
现金转化率经营现金流/净利润
18.00×
2.00×
过去12个月自由现金流最近4个季度
$803.0M
$829.9M

8季度趋势,按日历期对齐

经营现金流
CE
CE
HAS
HAS
Q4 25
$252.0M
$403.2M
Q3 25
$447.0M
$280.6M
Q2 25
$410.0M
$71.3M
Q1 25
$37.0M
$138.1M
Q4 24
$494.0M
$259.8M
Q3 24
$79.0M
$222.5M
Q2 24
$292.0M
$187.3M
Q1 24
$101.0M
$177.8M
自由现金流
CE
CE
HAS
HAS
Q4 25
$168.0M
$389.5M
Q3 25
$383.0M
$260.9M
Q2 25
$317.0M
$55.2M
Q1 25
$-65.0M
$124.3M
Q4 24
$389.0M
$200.8M
Q3 24
$-9.0M
$174.0M
Q2 24
$187.0M
$135.4M
Q1 24
$-36.0M
$132.0M
自由现金流率
CE
CE
HAS
HAS
Q4 25
7.6%
26.9%
Q3 25
15.8%
18.8%
Q2 25
12.5%
5.6%
Q1 25
-2.7%
14.0%
Q4 24
16.4%
18.2%
Q3 24
-0.3%
13.6%
Q2 24
7.1%
13.6%
Q1 24
-1.4%
17.4%
资本支出强度
CE
CE
HAS
HAS
Q4 25
3.8%
0.9%
Q3 25
2.6%
1.4%
Q2 25
3.7%
1.6%
Q1 25
4.3%
1.6%
Q4 24
4.4%
5.4%
Q3 24
3.3%
3.8%
Q2 24
4.0%
5.2%
Q1 24
5.2%
6.0%
现金转化率
CE
CE
HAS
HAS
Q4 25
18.00×
2.00×
Q3 25
1.20×
Q2 25
2.06×
Q1 25
1.40×
Q4 24
Q3 24
0.68×
1.00×
Q2 24
1.88×
1.35×
Q1 24
0.83×
3.05×

财务流量对比

营收 → 毛利润 → 营业利润 → 净利润流向图

业务分部营收拆解

CE
CE

Engineered Materials$1.3B58%
Acetyl Chain$940.0M43%

HAS
HAS

Grow Brands$1.1B75%
Optimize Brands$188.7M13%
Digital And Licensing Gaming$135.7M9%
Class Of Principal Product Family Brands$13.1M1%
Filmand TV$2.4M0%

相关对比