vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of 金宝汤 (CPB) and La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
金宝汤 is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $20.2M, roughly 132.4× La Rosa Holdings Corp.). 金宝汤 runs the higher net margin — 7.2% vs -27.4%, a 34.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, La Rosa Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -3.4%). Over the past eight quarters, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (72.5% CAGR vs 4.4%).
金宝汤是美国知名食品企业，核心旗舰产品为罐装汤品。其品牌旗下众多产品采用的经典红白罐设计已成为美国文化符号之一，艺术家安迪·沃霍尔创作的金宝汤罐系列波普艺术作品更让这一设计广为人知。
拉罗萨控股旗下的万拉罗萨父子通心粉公司由西西里移民文森佐·拉罗萨于1914年创立，发展至今已成为美国规模领先的区域知名食品品牌，可生产四十余种意面产品，在当地市场拥有较高的认可度。
CPB vs LRHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.7B | $20.2M |
| Net Profit | $194.0M | $-5.5M |
| Gross Margin | 29.6% | 8.4% |
| Operating Margin | 12.6% | -24.7% |
| Net Margin | 7.2% | -27.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.4% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -11.0% | -125.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.65 | $-5.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $13.1M |
| Q4 25 | $194.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $145.0M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $66.0M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $173.0M | $-95.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.0M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.0M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $203.0M | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | 29.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.4% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.5% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.3% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.4% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.9% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.6% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | -24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.2% | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | -17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | -9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.9% | -35.0% |
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | -27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 337.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | -546.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | -28.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.1% | -12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | -35.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.65 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.49 | $-5.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.22 | $15.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | $-5.86 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.72 | $28.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | $-16.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.44 | $-12.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.68 | $-0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $168.0M | $4.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $6.1B | $642.8K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $1.6M |
| Total Assets | $15.2B | $21.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.54× | 0.41× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $168.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.0M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $829.0M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $808.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $108.0M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.0M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $169.0M | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1B | $642.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $644.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5B | $645.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7B | $647.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $649.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8B | $650.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | $652.4K |
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9B | $-87.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9B | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8B | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | $15.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9B | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.8B | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9B | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.1B | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.2B | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.2B | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1B | $16.3M |
| Q4 25 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.56× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.58× | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.75× | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.52× | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.47× | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.17× | 0.12× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $224.0M | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $97.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 4.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 1.15× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $687.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $224.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.0M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $512.0M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $225.0M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $288.0M | $-591.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $213.0M | $-803.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $510.0M | $-538.3K |
| Q4 25 | $97.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $129.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $411.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $390.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.79× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.05× | -0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.51× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CPB
| Baked Snacks | $995.0M | 37% |
| Snacks | $914.0M | 34% |
| Simple Meals | $580.0M | 22% |
| Beverages | $168.0M | 6% |
LRHC
| Real Estate Residential Brokerage Services | $16.8M | 83% |
| Transferred Over Time | $3.5M | 17% |
