vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of 柯蒂斯-莱特 (CW) and Rafael Holdings, Inc. (RFL), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
柯蒂斯-莱特 is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($947.0M vs $240.0K, roughly 3945.8× Rafael Holdings, Inc.). 柯蒂斯-莱特 runs the higher net margin — 14.5% vs -4090.0%, a 4104.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rafael Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (87.5% vs 14.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Rafael Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (85.2% CAGR vs 15.2%).
柯蒂斯-莱特公司是总部位于美国北卡罗来纳州戴维森的制造与服务提供商，在美国内外均设有工厂及业务网点。公司1929年由柯蒂斯、莱特及多家供应商合并成立，成立之初即为美国最大航空企业，二战期间为美军生产了超14.2万台航空发动机。
拉斐尔先进防御系统有限公司是一家以色列国防科技企业，其前身是以色列国防部旗下负责开发武器与军用技术的国家级国防研发实验室，2002年正式改组为有限公司，专注于各类先进国防装备与军事技术的研发生产。
CW vs RFL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $947.0M | $240.0K |
| Net Profit | $137.0M | $-9.8M |
| Gross Margin | 37.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.2% | -4225.4% |
| Net Margin | 14.5% | -4090.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.9% | 87.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 16.2% | -9.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.69 | $-0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $947.0M | $240.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $869.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $876.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $805.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $824.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $798.9M | $165.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $784.8M | $336.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $713.2M | $68.0K |
| Q4 25 | $137.0M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $124.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $101.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $111.2M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $99.5M | $-32.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.5M | $6.0M |
| Q4 25 | 37.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.2% | 74.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.2% | -4225.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.1% | -2330.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.4% | -27726.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.0% | -4622.1% |
| Q4 25 | 14.5% | -4090.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.9% | -2707.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.7% | -9628.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | 8892.6% |
| Q4 25 | $3.69 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.31 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.19 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.68 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.09 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.89 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.58 | $-1.36 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.99 | $0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $45.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $957.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.5B | $85.2M |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $105.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.38× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $45.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $226.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $385.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $338.0M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $957.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $968.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $958.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $958.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $85.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $86.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $104.9M |
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $105.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9B | $96.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | $101.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | $106.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.44× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $352.7M | $-6.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $315.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 33.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 4.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 2.57× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $553.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $352.7M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $192.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $136.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-38.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $301.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $177.3M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.3M | $-251.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-45.6M | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | $315.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $175.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-54.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $278.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $162.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.3M | $-375.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-57.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.8% | -111.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 36.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.56× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.59× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.60× | -0.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CW
| Naval Power | $417.4M | 44% |
| Defense Electronics | $268.3M | 28% |
| Aerospace Industrial | $262.4M | 28% |
RFL
Segment breakdown not available.
