vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of 陶氏公司 (DOW) and 亨斯迈 (HUN), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
陶氏公司 is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.5B vs $1.4B, roughly 7.0× 亨斯迈). On growth, 亨斯迈 posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-6.7% vs -9.3%). Over the past eight quarters, 亨斯迈's revenue compounded faster (-4.0% CAGR vs -6.9%).
陶氏化学是总部位于美国密歇根州米德兰的跨国化工企业，2021年位列全球前三大化工生产商，为特拉华州注册的上市控股公司陶氏公司旗下运营子公司，其产品与解决方案广泛服务于制造业、消费品、基础设施建设等全球多个核心产业领域。
亨斯迈公司是总部位于美国得克萨斯州伍德兰兹的全球化化工巨头，面向消费端与工业客户生产、销售各类化工产品，主营聚氨酯、高性能材料及胶粘剂，客户覆盖宝马、通用电气、雪佛龙、宝洁、联合利华等知名品牌。目前公司在全球25个国家设有60余处生产、研发及运营基地，员工约7000人。
DOW vs HUN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | — | $-96.0M |
| Gross Margin | 5.8% | 12.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | -4.4% |
| Net Margin | — | -7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.3% | -6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 31.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.16 | $-0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.5B | $-96.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $62.0M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-835.0M | $-158.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-307.0M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-35.0M | $-141.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $214.0M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $439.0M | $22.0M |
| Q1 26 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.3% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 15.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -16.4% | -4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.5% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | -4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -15.6% | -7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.3% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.9% | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.3% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | $-2.16 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.16 | $-0.56 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.08 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.18 | $-0.92 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.44 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.82 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.30 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.62 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.8B | $429.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $17.8B | $2.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $16.0B | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $58.5B | $7.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.12× | 0.73× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q1 26 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $429.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $468.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $399.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $334.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $330.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $335.0M |
| Q1 26 | $17.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | $16.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.3B | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | $58.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $58.5B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.0B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.0B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.5B | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.3B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.4B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.5B | $7.3B |
| Q1 26 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.12× | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.01× | 0.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.94× | 0.72× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.95× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.91× | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.88× | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.87× | 0.62× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $76.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $19.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | 4.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $116.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $284.0M | $76.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $196.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-470.0M | $91.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.0M | $-74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $814.0M | $153.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $800.0M | $129.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $836.0M | $46.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-284.0M | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $563.0M | $153.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1B | $54.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-594.0M | $-110.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.0M | $102.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $113.0M | $-4.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.7% | -7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | -0.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.6% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.18× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.74× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.90× | 2.09× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
DOW
Segment breakdown not available.
HUN
| Diversified | $897.0M | 66% |
| Specialty | $231.0M | 17% |
| Performance Products | $113.0M | 8% |
| Advanced Materials | $61.0M | 5% |
| Related Party Customers | $19.0M | 1% |
| Other | $12.0M | 1% |
