vs

孩之宝(HAS)与LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC(LSTR)财务数据对比。点击上方公司名可切换其他公司

孩之宝的季度营收约是LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC的1.2倍($1.4B vs $1.2B),孩之宝净利率更高(13.9% vs 3.4%,领先10.6%),孩之宝同比增速更快(31.3% vs 1.6%),过去两年孩之宝的营收复合增速更高(38.2% vs -2.2%)

孩之宝是1923年12月6日成立的美国跨国玩具制造与娱乐控股企业,总部位于罗德岛州波塔基特。旗下拥有Kenner、米尔顿·布拉德利、派克兄弟、威世智等知名品牌,持有大量热门IP商标权,业务覆盖玩具生产、游戏开发、娱乐内容出品等多个领域。

Landstar System Inc.是美国专业运输服务企业,主营第三方物流业务,依托由超8800名独立自营车主、1000余名独立货运代理人、7万余家合规认证承运商组成的庞大网络,服务主要覆盖美国全境,同时提供加拿大境内及美加、美墨跨境物流服务。

HAS vs LSTR — 直观对比

营收规模更大
HAS
HAS
是对方的1.2倍
HAS
$1.4B
$1.2B
LSTR
营收增速更快
HAS
HAS
高出29.6%
HAS
31.3%
1.6%
LSTR
净利率更高
HAS
HAS
高出10.6%
HAS
13.9%
3.4%
LSTR
两年增速更快
HAS
HAS
近两年复合增速
HAS
38.2%
-2.2%
LSTR

损益表 — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

指标
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
营收
$1.4B
$1.2B
净利润
$201.6M
$39.4M
毛利率
68.7%
9.6%
营业利润率
20.6%
4.5%
净利率
13.9%
3.4%
营收同比
31.3%
1.6%
净利润同比
687.8%
32.3%
每股收益(稀释后)
$1.46
$1.16

绿色 = 该指标领先。财年不对齐时期间可能不同

8季度营收与利润趋势

并排季度历史对比,按日历期对齐,财年错位的公司也能正确匹配

营收
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
$1.2B
Q4 25
$1.4B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$1.2B
Q2 25
$980.8M
$1.2B
Q1 25
$887.1M
$1.2B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$1.2B
Q2 24
$995.3M
$1.2B
净利润
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
$39.4M
Q4 25
$201.6M
$23.9M
Q3 25
$233.2M
$19.4M
Q2 25
$-855.8M
$41.9M
Q1 25
$98.6M
$29.8M
Q4 24
$-34.3M
$46.2M
Q3 24
$223.2M
$50.0M
Q2 24
$138.5M
$52.6M
毛利率
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
9.6%
Q4 25
68.7%
Q3 25
70.1%
Q2 25
77.0%
Q1 25
76.9%
Q4 24
67.4%
Q3 24
70.4%
Q2 24
76.1%
营业利润率
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
4.5%
Q4 25
20.6%
2.5%
Q3 25
24.6%
2.2%
Q2 25
-81.4%
4.6%
Q1 25
19.2%
3.4%
Q4 24
5.4%
4.8%
Q3 24
23.6%
5.2%
Q2 24
21.3%
5.6%
净利率
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
3.4%
Q4 25
13.9%
2.0%
Q3 25
16.8%
1.6%
Q2 25
-87.3%
3.5%
Q1 25
11.1%
2.6%
Q4 24
-3.1%
3.8%
Q3 24
17.4%
4.1%
Q2 24
13.9%
4.3%
每股收益(稀释后)
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
$1.16
Q4 25
$1.46
$0.70
Q3 25
$1.64
$0.56
Q2 25
$-6.10
$1.20
Q1 25
$0.70
$0.85
Q4 24
$-0.25
$1.30
Q3 24
$1.59
$1.41
Q2 24
$0.99
$1.48

资产负债表与财务实力

最新季度各公司的流动性、杠杆与账面价值一览

指标
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
现金及短期投资手头流动性
$411.0M
总债务越低越好
$26.1M
股东权益账面价值
$565.5M
$799.0M
总资产
$5.6B
$1.6B
负债/权益比越低杠杆越低
0.03×

8季度趋势,按日历期对齐

现金及短期投资
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
$411.0M
Q4 25
$452.2M
Q3 25
$434.4M
Q2 25
$426.2M
Q1 25
$473.4M
Q4 24
$566.6M
Q3 24
$531.3M
Q2 24
$504.0M
总债务
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
$26.1M
Q4 25
$0
Q3 25
$0
Q2 25
$0
Q1 25
$0
Q4 24
$0
Q3 24
$0
Q2 24
$0
股东权益
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
$799.0M
Q4 25
$565.5M
$795.7M
Q3 25
$433.8M
$888.7M
Q2 25
$269.7M
$921.8M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$930.8M
Q4 24
$1.2B
$972.4M
Q3 24
$1.3B
$1.0B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$1.0B
总资产
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
$1.6B
Q4 25
$5.6B
$1.6B
Q3 25
$5.5B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$5.2B
$1.7B
Q1 25
$6.0B
$1.7B
Q4 24
$6.3B
$1.8B
Q3 24
$7.2B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$6.9B
$1.8B
负债/权益比
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
0.03×
Q4 25
0.00×
Q3 25
0.00×
Q2 25
0.00×
Q1 25
0.00×
Q4 24
0.00×
Q3 24
0.00×
Q2 24
0.00×

现金流与资本效率

扣除再投资后实际产生的现金。现金流比净利润更难造假

指标
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
经营现金流最新季度
$403.2M
自由现金流经营现金流 - 资本支出
$389.5M
自由现金流率自由现金流/营收
26.9%
资本支出强度资本支出/营收
0.9%
现金转化率经营现金流/净利润
2.00×
过去12个月自由现金流最近4个季度
$829.9M

8季度趋势,按日历期对齐

经营现金流
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
Q4 25
$403.2M
$72.7M
Q3 25
$280.6M
$89.3M
Q2 25
$71.3M
$7.1M
Q1 25
$138.1M
$55.7M
Q4 24
$259.8M
$61.1M
Q3 24
$222.5M
$83.1M
Q2 24
$187.3M
$48.1M
自由现金流
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
Q4 25
$389.5M
$70.5M
Q3 25
$260.9M
$86.0M
Q2 25
$55.2M
$4.7M
Q1 25
$124.3M
$53.8M
Q4 24
$200.8M
$54.4M
Q3 24
$174.0M
$75.6M
Q2 24
$135.4M
$40.6M
自由现金流率
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
Q4 25
26.9%
6.0%
Q3 25
18.8%
7.1%
Q2 25
5.6%
0.4%
Q1 25
14.0%
4.7%
Q4 24
18.2%
4.5%
Q3 24
13.6%
6.2%
Q2 24
13.6%
3.3%
资本支出强度
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.9%
0.2%
Q3 25
1.4%
0.3%
Q2 25
1.6%
0.2%
Q1 25
1.6%
0.2%
Q4 24
5.4%
0.6%
Q3 24
3.8%
0.6%
Q2 24
5.2%
0.6%
现金转化率
HAS
HAS
LSTR
LSTR
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.00×
3.04×
Q3 25
1.20×
4.61×
Q2 25
0.17×
Q1 25
1.40×
1.87×
Q4 24
1.32×
Q3 24
1.00×
1.66×
Q2 24
1.35×
0.91×

财务流量对比

营收 → 毛利润 → 营业利润 → 净利润流向图

业务分部营收拆解

HAS
HAS

Grow Brands$1.1B75%
Optimize Brands$188.7M13%
Digital And Licensing Gaming$135.7M9%
Class Of Principal Product Family Brands$13.1M1%
Filmand TV$2.4M0%

LSTR
LSTR

暂无分部数据

相关对比