vs

孩之宝(HAS)与泰佩思琦(TPR)财务数据对比。点击上方公司名可切换其他公司

泰佩思琦的季度营收约是孩之宝的1.3倍($1.9B vs $1.4B),泰佩思琦净利率更高(17.9% vs 13.9%,领先4.0%),孩之宝同比增速更快(31.3% vs 21.0%),过去两年孩之宝的营收复合增速更高(38.2% vs 9.9%)

孩之宝是1923年12月6日成立的美国跨国玩具制造与娱乐控股企业,总部位于罗德岛州波塔基特。旗下拥有Kenner、米尔顿·布拉德利、派克兄弟、威世智等知名品牌,持有大量热门IP商标权,业务覆盖玩具生产、游戏开发、娱乐内容出品等多个领域。

Tapestry, Inc.是美国知名跨国奢侈品时尚控股企业,旗下拥有Coach、Kate Spade New York、Stuart Weitzman三大标志性生活方式品牌,主营高端手袋、服饰、鞋履、配饰及香水产品,销售渠道覆盖全球线下门店与线上电商平台。

HAS vs TPR — 直观对比

营收规模更大
TPR
TPR
是对方的1.3倍
TPR
$1.9B
$1.4B
HAS
营收增速更快
HAS
HAS
高出10.3%
HAS
31.3%
21.0%
TPR
净利率更高
TPR
TPR
高出4.0%
TPR
17.9%
13.9%
HAS
两年增速更快
HAS
HAS
近两年复合增速
HAS
38.2%
9.9%
TPR

损益表 — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

指标
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
营收
$1.4B
$1.9B
净利润
$201.6M
$343.8M
毛利率
68.7%
76.9%
营业利润率
20.6%
22.3%
净利率
13.9%
17.9%
营收同比
31.3%
21.0%
净利润同比
687.8%
每股收益(稀释后)
$1.46
$1.65

绿色 = 该指标领先。财年不对齐时期间可能不同

8季度营收与利润趋势

并排季度历史对比,按日历期对齐,财年错位的公司也能正确匹配

营收
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
Q1 26
$1.9B
Q4 25
$1.4B
$2.5B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$980.8M
$1.7B
Q1 25
$887.1M
$1.6B
Q4 24
$1.1B
$2.2B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$1.5B
Q2 24
$995.3M
$1.6B
净利润
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
Q1 26
$343.8M
Q4 25
$201.6M
$561.3M
Q3 25
$233.2M
$274.8M
Q2 25
$-855.8M
$-517.1M
Q1 25
$98.6M
$203.3M
Q4 24
$-34.3M
$310.4M
Q3 24
$223.2M
$186.6M
Q2 24
$138.5M
$159.3M
毛利率
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
Q1 26
76.9%
Q4 25
68.7%
75.5%
Q3 25
70.1%
76.3%
Q2 25
77.0%
76.3%
Q1 25
76.9%
76.1%
Q4 24
67.4%
74.4%
Q3 24
70.4%
75.3%
Q2 24
76.1%
74.9%
营业利润率
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
Q1 26
22.3%
Q4 25
20.6%
28.6%
Q3 25
24.6%
19.3%
Q2 25
-81.4%
-33.9%
Q1 25
19.2%
16.0%
Q4 24
5.4%
22.4%
Q3 24
23.6%
16.7%
Q2 24
21.3%
14.8%
净利率
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
Q1 26
17.9%
Q4 25
13.9%
22.4%
Q3 25
16.8%
16.1%
Q2 25
-87.3%
-30.0%
Q1 25
11.1%
12.8%
Q4 24
-3.1%
14.1%
Q3 24
17.4%
12.4%
Q2 24
13.9%
10.0%
每股收益(稀释后)
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
Q1 26
$1.65
Q4 25
$1.46
$2.68
Q3 25
$1.64
$1.28
Q2 25
$-6.10
$-2.30
Q1 25
$0.70
$0.95
Q4 24
$-0.25
$1.38
Q3 24
$1.59
$0.79
Q2 24
$0.99
$0.67

资产负债表与财务实力

最新季度各公司的流动性、杠杆与账面价值一览

指标
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
现金及短期投资手头流动性
$1.1B
总债务越低越好
$2.4B
股东权益账面价值
$565.5M
$682.4M
总资产
$5.6B
$6.5B
负债/权益比越低杠杆越低
3.48×

8季度趋势,按日历期对齐

现金及短期投资
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
Q1 26
$1.1B
Q4 25
$1.1B
Q3 25
$743.2M
Q2 25
$1.1B
Q1 25
$1.1B
Q4 24
$1.0B
Q3 24
$7.3B
Q2 24
$7.2B
总债务
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
Q1 26
$2.4B
Q4 25
$2.4B
Q3 25
$2.4B
Q2 25
$2.4B
Q1 25
$2.4B
Q4 24
$2.4B
Q3 24
$7.0B
Q2 24
$6.9B
股东权益
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
Q1 26
$682.4M
Q4 25
$565.5M
$551.2M
Q3 25
$433.8M
$399.5M
Q2 25
$269.7M
$857.8M
Q1 25
$1.2B
$1.5B
Q4 24
$1.2B
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$3.0B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$2.9B
总资产
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
Q1 26
$6.5B
Q4 25
$5.6B
$6.5B
Q3 25
$5.5B
$6.4B
Q2 25
$5.2B
$6.6B
Q1 25
$6.0B
$7.3B
Q4 24
$6.3B
$7.3B
Q3 24
$7.2B
$13.7B
Q2 24
$6.9B
$13.4B
负债/权益比
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
Q1 26
3.48×
Q4 25
4.32×
Q3 25
5.95×
Q2 25
2.77×
Q1 25
1.59×
Q4 24
1.78×
Q3 24
2.35×
Q2 24
2.39×

现金流与资本效率

扣除再投资后实际产生的现金。现金流比净利润更难造假

指标
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
经营现金流最新季度
$403.2M
自由现金流经营现金流 - 资本支出
$389.5M
自由现金流率自由现金流/营收
26.9%
资本支出强度资本支出/营收
0.9%
现金转化率经营现金流/净利润
2.00×
过去12个月自由现金流最近4个季度
$829.9M

8季度趋势,按日历期对齐

经营现金流
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
Q1 26
Q4 25
$403.2M
$1.1B
Q3 25
$280.6M
$112.6M
Q2 25
$71.3M
$446.8M
Q1 25
$138.1M
$144.3M
Q4 24
$259.8M
$506.0M
Q3 24
$222.5M
$119.5M
Q2 24
$187.3M
$256.0M
自由现金流
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
Q1 26
Q4 25
$389.5M
$1.0B
Q3 25
$260.9M
$80.2M
Q2 25
$55.2M
$411.5M
Q1 25
$124.3M
$113.4M
Q4 24
$200.8M
$475.1M
Q3 24
$174.0M
$93.9M
Q2 24
$135.4M
$209.8M
自由现金流率
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
Q1 26
Q4 25
26.9%
41.5%
Q3 25
18.8%
4.7%
Q2 25
5.6%
23.9%
Q1 25
14.0%
7.2%
Q4 24
18.2%
21.6%
Q3 24
13.6%
6.2%
Q2 24
13.6%
13.2%
资本支出强度
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.9%
1.7%
Q3 25
1.4%
1.9%
Q2 25
1.6%
2.0%
Q1 25
1.6%
2.0%
Q4 24
5.4%
1.4%
Q3 24
3.8%
1.7%
Q2 24
5.2%
2.9%
现金转化率
HAS
HAS
TPR
TPR
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.00×
1.93×
Q3 25
1.20×
0.41×
Q2 25
Q1 25
1.40×
0.71×
Q4 24
1.63×
Q3 24
1.00×
0.64×
Q2 24
1.35×
1.61×

财务流量对比

营收 → 毛利润 → 营业利润 → 净利润流向图

业务分部营收拆解

HAS
HAS

Grow Brands$1.1B75%
Optimize Brands$188.7M13%
Digital And Licensing Gaming$135.7M9%
Class Of Principal Product Family Brands$13.1M1%
Filmand TV$2.4M0%

TPR
TPR

暂无分部数据

相关对比