vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of 宜瑞安 (INGR) and La Rosa Holdings Corp. (LRHC), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
宜瑞安 is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $20.2M, roughly 86.9× La Rosa Holdings Corp.). 宜瑞安 runs the higher net margin — 9.5% vs -27.4%, a 36.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, La Rosa Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -2.4%). Over the past eight quarters, La Rosa Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (72.5% CAGR vs -3.4%).
宜瑞安（Ingredion Inc.）是总部位于美国伊利诺伊州的食品饮料配料供应商，主打产品包括淀粉、非转基因甜味剂、甜菊糖、豌豆蛋白等，以玉米、木薯、马铃薯、谷物、果蔬等为原料，产品供应食品、饮料、酿造、制药等多个行业，在全球44个站点拥有约1.2万名员工，客户覆盖超120个国家。
拉罗萨控股旗下的万拉罗萨父子通心粉公司由西西里移民文森佐·拉罗萨于1914年创立，发展至今已成为美国规模领先的区域知名食品品牌，可生产四十余种意面产品，在当地市场拥有较高的认可度。
INGR vs LRHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $20.2M |
| Net Profit | $167.0M | $-5.5M |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 8.4% |
| Operating Margin | 12.5% | -24.7% |
| Net Margin | 9.5% | -27.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.4% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 72.2% | -125.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.58 | $-5.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $17.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9B | $13.1M |
| Q4 25 | $167.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $171.0M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $196.0M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $197.0M | $-95.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $97.0M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $188.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.0M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $216.0M | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | 24.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.9% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.6% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.2% | 8.9% |
| Q4 25 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | -24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | -26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | -17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.3% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.8% | -9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.3% | -35.0% |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | -27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 337.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.9% | -546.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | -28.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.1% | -12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.5% | -35.1% |
| Q4 25 | $2.58 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.61 | $-5.44 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.99 | $15.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.00 | $-5.86 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.43 | $28.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.83 | $-16.49 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.22 | $-12.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.23 | $-0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0B | $4.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $642.8K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $1.6M |
| Total Assets | $7.9B | $21.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.41× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $915.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $861.0M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $837.0M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $997.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $877.0M | $1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $505.0M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $438.0M | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $642.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $644.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $645.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $647.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $649.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $650.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $652.4K |
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $-87.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.7B | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8B | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8B | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5B | $21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.4B | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $18.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.3B | $16.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.12× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $405.0M | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $270.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 7.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 2.43× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $511.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $405.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $277.0M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $185.0M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $77.0M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $436.0M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $479.0M | $-591.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $312.0M | $-803.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $209.0M | $-538.3K |
| Q4 25 | $270.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $311.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $429.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $257.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.62× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.94× | -0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.49× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.55× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.97× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
INGR
| Food And Industrial Ingredients LATAM Segment | $599.0M | 34% |
| Texture And Healthful Solutions Segment | $598.0M | 34% |
| Food And Industrial Ingredients U.S.Canada Segment | $486.0M | 28% |
| Other | $74.0M | 4% |
LRHC
| Real Estate Residential Brokerage Services | $16.8M | 83% |
| Transferred Over Time | $3.5M | 17% |
