vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) and Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($247.1M vs $32.1M, roughly 7.7× Nebius Group N.V.). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.9M vs $-586.8M).
Nebius Group N.V., headquartered in Amsterdam, is a technology company that provides artificial intelligence infrastructure. The company also owns Avride and TripleTen, as well as stakes in Toloka and Clickhouse. It is headquartered in Amsterdam with offices in Israel and the United States.
Information technology (IT) is the study or use of computers, telecommunication systems and other devices to create, process, store, retrieve and transmit information. While the term is commonly used to refer to computers and computer networks, it also encompasses other information distribution technologies such as television and telephones. Information technology is an application of computer science and computer engineering.
NBIS vs PRTH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $32.1M | $247.1M |
| Net Profit | — | $8.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -251.1% | 13.6% |
| Net Margin | — | 3.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 8.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 23.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $247.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.1M | $241.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.2M | $239.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $224.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $227.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.3M | $219.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $205.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-185.4M | $10.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-258.2M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-118.3M | $994.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -251.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -754.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -366.1% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -563.1% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -766.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -324.4% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -325.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.8B | $77.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.8B | $-100.4M |
| Total Assets | $10.1B | $2.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $77.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $57.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $50.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $47.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $58.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $41.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $34.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $34.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $997.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $917.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $918.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $920.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $808.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $809.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $631.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-100.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $-110.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $-146.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-158.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-166.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $-165.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.3B | $-172.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-159.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-196.8M | $36.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-586.8M | $30.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1828.0% | 12.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 1215.0% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | 4.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $75.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $36.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-196.8M | $36.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-162.0M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $28.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $13.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $30.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-586.8M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-379.9M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1828.0% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1569.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1215.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 900.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.12× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NBIS
| Nebius | $27.1M | 84% |
| TripleTen | $6.3M | 20% |
| Avride | $100.0K | 0% |
PRTH
Segment breakdown not available.
