vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ROKU, INC (ROKU) and Viomi Technology Co., Ltd (VIOT), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Roku, Inc. is an American streaming technology company. Founded in 2002 by Anthony Wood, it produces digital media players and TVs, distributes streaming services and operates an ad business on its platform. Roku is the U.S. market leader in streaming video distribution, reaching 145 million people as of 2024. The company also operates in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the U.K., and Latin America.
YI Technology, also known as Xiaoyi in Mainland China markets, is a company that manufactures cameras and computer vision technologies. Some of the company's popular camera models include the YI 1080p Home Camera, and the YI Outdoor Security Camera. YI Technology was originally backed and branded by Xiaomi, but in October 2016, YI split off from Xiaomi, dropping the "Xiaomi Yi" branding.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $968.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $881.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $80.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-35.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-34.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-50.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 43.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.55 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.24 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.24 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.35 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
