vs
森馨科技(SXT)与碳博士控股(TANH)财务数据对比。点击上方公司名可切换其他公司
森馨科技的季度营收约是碳博士控股的20.3倍($435.8M vs $21.5M)。森馨科技净利率更高(10.1% vs 8.2%,领先1.9%)。森馨科技同比增速更快(54.2% vs -0.2%)
森馨科技是总部位于美国威斯康星州密尔沃基的全球化色素、香精香料生产商及销售商,产品广泛应用于食品饮料、医药、化妆品、家居个护、特种印刷成像、计算机成像及工业着色等多个领域,旗下设有香精香料事业部与色素事业部两大核心业务板块。
碳博士控股是一家总部位于中国的特种制造企业,主要从事竹炭制品、高性能清洁能源材料及环保消费品的研发、生产与销售,客户覆盖中国本土及全球多个市场的消费品、工业材料及新能源领域。
SXT vs TANH — 直观对比
营收规模更大
SXT
是对方的20.3倍
$21.5M
营收增速更快
SXT
高出54.4%
-0.2%
净利率更高
SXT
高出1.9%
8.2%
损益表 — Q1 2026 vs Q2 2025
| 指标 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 营收 | $435.8M | $21.5M |
| 净利润 | $44.2M | $1.8M |
| 毛利率 | — | 22.2% |
| 营业利润率 | 15.3% | 10.8% |
| 净利率 | 10.1% | 8.2% |
| 营收同比 | 54.2% | -0.2% |
| 净利润同比 | 28.2% | 59.8% |
| 每股收益(稀释后) | $1.04 | — |
绿色 = 该指标领先。财年不对齐时期间可能不同
8季度营收与利润趋势
并排季度历史对比,按日历期对齐,财年错位的公司也能正确匹配
营收
SXT
TANH
| Q1 26 | $435.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $393.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $412.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $414.2M | $21.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $392.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $376.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $392.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $403.5M | $21.5M |
净利润
SXT
TANH
| Q1 26 | $44.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.6M | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $1.1M |
毛利率
SXT
TANH
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.5% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.4% | 22.3% |
营业利润率
SXT
TANH
| Q1 26 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | 10.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | 8.0% |
净利率
SXT
TANH
| Q1 26 | 10.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.7% | 5.1% |
每股收益(稀释后)
SXT
TANH
| Q1 26 | $1.04 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.60 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.87 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.88 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.81 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.71 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.77 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.73 | $0.21 |
资产负债表与财务实力
最新季度各公司的流动性、杠杆与账面价值一览
| 指标 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 现金及短期投资手头流动性 | $38.5M | $35.2M |
| 总债务越低越好 | $767.8M | — |
| 股东权益账面价值 | $1.2B | $128.3M |
| 总资产 | $2.3B | $143.0M |
| 负债/权益比越低杠杆越低 | 0.63× | — |
8季度趋势,按日历期对齐
现金及短期投资
SXT
TANH
| Q1 26 | $38.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.7M | $35.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.3M | $34.2M |
总债务
SXT
TANH
| Q1 26 | $767.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $709.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $613.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
股东权益
SXT
TANH
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $128.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $126.0M |
总资产
SXT
TANH
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $143.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $142.2M |
负债/权益比
SXT
TANH
| Q1 26 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
财务流量对比
营收 → 毛利润 → 营业利润 → 净利润流向图
业务分部营收拆解
SXT
暂无分部数据
TANH
| Revenue from China | $20.9M | 97% |
| Revenue directly from foreign countries | $602.2K | 3% |