vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and NEWELL BRANDS INC. (NWL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NEWELL BRANDS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.1× Agilent Technologies). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs -16.6%, a 33.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Agilent Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs -2.7%). Agilent Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($175.0M vs $91.0M). Over the past eight quarters, NEWELL BRANDS INC.'s revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs 6.9%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
Newell Brands Inc. is an American conglomerate of consumer and commercial products. The company's brands and products include Rubbermaid storage/or waste disposal containers; home organization and reusable container products; Contigo and Bubba water bottles; Coleman outdoor products; writing instruments glue ; children's products ; cookware and small appliances and fragrance products.
A vs NWL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $-315.0M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | -14.3% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | -16.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | -2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | -483.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $-0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $-315.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $46.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $-54.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $-198.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $45.0M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | 33.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 35.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | 32.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | 34.4% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | -14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 8.0% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | -16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | -2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 2.2% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $-0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $-0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $203.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $2.4B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $10.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $203.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $229.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $219.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $198.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $494.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $382.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $11.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $11.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $11.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $12.0B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $161.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $91.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | 4.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $17.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $161.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $374.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $-58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $-213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $150.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $282.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $32.0M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $91.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $315.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $-117.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $-272.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $54.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $231.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $-21.0M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | -17.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | -1.0% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 2.6% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 17.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | -1.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 0.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
NWL
| Kitchen | $538.0M | 28% |
| Writing | $370.0M | 20% |
| Commercial | $320.0M | 17% |
| Financial Institution Two | $286.0M | 15% |
| Baby | $259.0M | 14% |
| Outdoor And Recreation | $142.0M | 7% |
