vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Acadian Asset Management Inc. (AAMI) and ZIPRECRUITER, INC. (ZIP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Acadian Asset Management Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($172.2M vs $111.7M, roughly 1.5× ZIPRECRUITER, INC.). Acadian Asset Management Inc. runs the higher net margin — 20.2% vs -0.7%, a 20.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Acadian Asset Management Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs 0.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Acadian Asset Management Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.6% CAGR vs -4.4%).
United Asset Management was an American holding company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.
ZipRecruiter, Inc. is an American employment marketplace for job seekers and employers.
AAMI vs ZIP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $172.2M | $111.7M |
| Net Profit | $34.7M | $-835.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 89.1% |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | 3.6% |
| Net Margin | 20.2% | -0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -18.4% | 92.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.97 | $-0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $172.2M | $111.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.2M | $115.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.4M | $112.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.9M | $110.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $167.8M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $123.1M | $117.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $109.0M | $123.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $105.7M | $122.2M |
| Q4 25 | $34.7M | $-835.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.1M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.5M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $-6.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 89.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 89.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 89.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 89.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 89.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 89.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 89.1% |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.6% | -10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.9% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.7% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | -0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | -11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.3% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.7% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.97 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.42 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.54 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.11 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.45 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.29 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.37 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $188.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $200.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $-77.2M |
| Total Assets | $677.0M | $569.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $188.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $211.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $203.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $221.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $218.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $225.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $271.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $282.5M |
| Q4 25 | $200.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-77.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-76.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-65.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $677.0M | $569.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $751.4M | $573.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $672.3M | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.3M | $629.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $703.2M | $664.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $555.2M | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $533.1M | $665.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $544.9M | $662.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.4M | $7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $7.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.07× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $9.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-2.4M | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.9M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.6M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-48.8M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $55.8M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.6M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.7M | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.4M | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | -0.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.58× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.43× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.15× | 3.12× | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.77× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AAMI
Segment breakdown not available.
ZIP
| License | $84.3M | 75% |
| Services | $27.4M | 25% |
