vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AGNC Investment Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($206.0M vs $9.6M, roughly 21.4× American Assets Trust, Inc.). On growth, AGNC Investment Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (79.1% vs -5.5%). Over the past eight quarters, AGNC Investment Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (187.1% CAGR vs -5.2%).
Personal Assets Trust is a large British investment trust. The company is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The chairman is Iain Ferguson CBE.
The Russell 1000 Index is a U.S. stock market index that tracks the largest 1,000 stocks in the Russell 3000 Index, which represent about 93% of the total market capitalization of that index. The index is market cap weighted, meaning larger companies have a greater influence on the index than smaller companies.
AAT vs AGNC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.6M | $206.0M |
| Net Profit | — | $954.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | — | 463.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.5% | 79.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 682.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.06 | $0.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.6M | $206.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $148.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $162.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9M | $159.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $-64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.7M | $-30.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $954.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $806.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | $-140.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.5M | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $346.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.9M | $-48.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.3M | $443.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 463.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.6% | 544.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.2% | -86.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 429.3% | 31.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 145.5% | -540.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 111.9% | 1600.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 179.4% | -1476.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $0.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $0.72 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.70 | $0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.28 | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.20 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.32 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $129.4M | $450.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $12.4B |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $115.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.48× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $129.4M | $450.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.7M | $450.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.7M | $656.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.9M | $455.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $425.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $533.0M | $507.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.9M | $530.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $98.6M | $505.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $12.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $10.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $10.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $8.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $8.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $115.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $109.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $102.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $95.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $89.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $79.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0B | $71.9B |
| Q4 25 | 1.48× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $40.6M | $128.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $23.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 238.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 182.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.13× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $94.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | $128.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.5M | $153.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.2M | $180.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.9M | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.4M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.3M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $54.8M | $20.0M |
| Q4 25 | $23.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 238.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 228.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 276.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 206.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 210.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 244.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 409.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 408.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 182.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 172.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 203.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 166.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 187.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 213.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 147.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 101.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.98× | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.87× | 3.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.15× | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.98× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.84× | 0.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.