vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and ClearSign Technologies Corp (CLIR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8M vs $3.7M, roughly 1.3× ClearSign Technologies Corp). ClearSign Technologies Corp runs the higher net margin — -8.5% vs -195.0%, a 186.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1331.8% vs 522.2%).
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
ClearSign Technologies Corporation (ClearSign) is a United States-based company that develops emission-control technology.
ABAT vs CLIR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $3.7M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $-311.0K |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | 21.9% |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | -22.5% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | -8.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | 522.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | 73.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $133.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | $401.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $590.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $45.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | $-311.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | 41.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | 48.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 93.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 39.7% |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | -22.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | -170.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | -1382.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | -562.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -282.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -77.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4748.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -113.6% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | -8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | -138.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | -1263.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | -517.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -197.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -62.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4160.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -100.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.40 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | $9.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $9.5M |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $12.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $12.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.6M |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | $14.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $-1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-511.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-415.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -278.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
