vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.2M vs $4.8M, roughly 1.1× AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co). Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 31.2% vs -195.0%, a 226.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
Namdar Realty Group is a private, family-owned real estate investment trust based in Great Neck, New York. As of 2021, the company owns over 400 properties.
ABAT vs SUNS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $5.2M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $1.6M |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | 31.2% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | 31.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5M |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | 31.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | 67.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | 59.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | 67.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 54.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 76.5% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | 31.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | 67.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | 59.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | 67.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 54.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 76.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | $6.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $182.0M |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $310.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | $6.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $70.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $11.3M |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | $182.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | $184.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | $184.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | $184.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $112.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $48.9M |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | $310.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | $258.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | $256.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | $234.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.5M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $-3.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $-656.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-322.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $-914.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-513.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.16× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
