vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASBURY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP INC (ABG) and LITHIA MOTORS INC (LAD), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LITHIA MOTORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.2B vs $4.7B, roughly 2.0× ASBURY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP INC). LITHIA MOTORS INC runs the higher net margin — 1.3% vs 1.5%, a 0.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ASBURY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.8% vs 0.3%). Over the past eight quarters, ASBURY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP INC's revenue compounded faster (5.5% CAGR vs 3.6%).
Asbury Automotive Group is an American company based in the Atlanta area that operates auto dealerships in various parts of the United States. Founded in 1995, it was ranked No. 242 on the 2025 Fortune 500 list.
Lithia Motors, Inc. is an American nationwide automotive dealership group headquartered in Medford, Oregon. As of 2025, Lithia is the largest automotive retailer in the United States by revenue, ahead of competitors such as AutoNation and Penske Automotive Group. As of December 31, 2024, Lithia operates 459 dealership locations across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The company employs approximately 30,000 people worldwide.
ABG vs LAD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.7B | $9.2B |
| Net Profit | $60.0M | $136.9M |
| Gross Margin | 17.0% | 14.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.7% | 3.7% |
| Net Margin | 1.3% | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.8% | 0.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -53.4% | -36.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.14 | $5.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.7B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4B | $9.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | $9.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $9.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.2B | $8.6B |
| Q4 25 | $60.0M | $136.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.1M | $217.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.8M | $256.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.1M | $209.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $128.8M | $216.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $126.3M | $209.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.1M | $214.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.1M | $162.6M |
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.5% | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.2% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.9% | 15.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.1% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.9% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | $3.14 | $5.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.52 | $8.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.76 | $9.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.71 | $7.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.53 | $8.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.37 | $7.80 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.39 | $7.87 | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.21 | $5.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $500.0K | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.1B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.9B | $6.6B |
| Total Assets | $11.6B | $25.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.79× | 1.47× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $500.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $900.0K | $206.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6M | $234.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0M | $209.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.5M | $516.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $264.4M |
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.6B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3B | $6.4B |
| Q4 25 | $11.6B | $25.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.8B | $24.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1B | $24.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2B | $23.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.3B | $23.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2B | $23.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.3B | $23.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.1B | $22.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.79× | 1.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.86× | 1.23× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.05× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.93× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $151.9M | $123.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $30.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 2.53× | 0.90× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $5.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $151.9M | $123.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $306.9M | $-98.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.4M | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $225.0M | $322.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $244.2M | $61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $404.3M | $219.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-154.4M | $-148.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $177.1M | $292.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-207.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-70.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $253.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $157.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-278.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $212.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.53× | 0.90× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.09× | -0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.60× | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.70× | 1.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.90× | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.20× | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.49× | -0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.20× | 1.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ABG
| Dealerships | $4.6B | 98% |
| TCA | $81.4M | 2% |
| New Vehicles | $33.5M | 1% |
LAD
Segment breakdown not available.
