vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE INC (GPI) and LITHIA MOTORS INC (LAD), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LITHIA MOTORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.2B vs $5.6B, roughly 1.6× GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE INC). LITHIA MOTORS INC runs the higher net margin — 0.8% vs 1.5%, a 0.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.6% vs 0.3%). GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($51.4M vs $30.5M). Over the past eight quarters, GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE INC's revenue compounded faster (11.7% CAGR vs 3.6%).
Group 1 Automotive, Inc. is an international Fortune 300 automotive retailer with automotive dealerships and collision centers in the United States and the United Kingdom. Group 1 sells new and used cars and light trucks, arranges financial services, provides maintenance and repair services, and sells vehicle parts. As of 2024, the company employs over 20,000 people globally.
Lithia Motors, Inc. is an American nationwide automotive dealership group headquartered in Medford, Oregon. As of 2025, Lithia is the largest automotive retailer in the United States by revenue, ahead of competitors such as AutoNation and Penske Automotive Group. As of December 31, 2024, Lithia operates 459 dealership locations across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The company employs approximately 30,000 people worldwide.
GPI vs LAD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.6B | $9.2B |
| Net Profit | $43.6M | $136.9M |
| Gross Margin | 15.7% | 14.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 3.7% |
| Net Margin | 0.8% | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.6% | 0.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -54.0% | -36.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.75 | $5.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.6B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.8B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $9.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $9.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | $9.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5B | $8.6B |
| Q4 25 | $43.6M | $136.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.0M | $217.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.5M | $256.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.1M | $209.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.7M | $216.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $117.3M | $209.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.2M | $214.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.9M | $162.6M |
| Q4 25 | 15.7% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.4% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.2% | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.9% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.3% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.3% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.6% | 15.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.2% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.3% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | $3.75 | $5.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.00 | $8.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.82 | $9.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.67 | $7.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.15 | $8.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.69 | $7.80 | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.17 | $7.87 | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.80 | $5.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $32.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.4B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.8B | $6.6B |
| Total Assets | $10.3B | $25.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.23× | 1.47× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $32.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.8M | $206.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.7M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.5M | $234.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.7M | $209.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.4M | $516.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.9M | $264.4M |
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $6.4B |
| Q4 25 | $10.3B | $25.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.4B | $24.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2B | $24.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.9B | $23.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $23.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.0B | $23.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.9B | $23.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.5B | $22.2B |
| Q4 25 | 1.23× | 1.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.97× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.92× | 1.23× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.87× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $129.2M | $123.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $30.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.9% | 0.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 1.4% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 2.96× | 0.90× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $424.5M | $5.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $129.2M | $123.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.0M | $-98.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $251.6M | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $158.7M | $322.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $212.6M | $61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $243.9M | $219.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-124.1M | $-148.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $253.9M | $292.4M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.7M | $-207.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $179.9M | $-70.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $106.5M | $253.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $120.1M | $-17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $194.2M | $157.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-163.8M | $-278.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $190.7M | $212.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | -0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.2% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.5% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.3% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.4% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.96× | 0.90× | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.92× | -0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.79× | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | 1.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.24× | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.08× | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.90× | -0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.72× | 1.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
GPI
| New Vehicles Retail | $2.8B | 50% |
| Used Vehicles Retail | $1.7B | 31% |
| Parts And Service | $700.2M | 13% |
| Financial Service | $229.7M | 4% |
| Used Vehicles Wholesale | $143.5M | 3% |
LAD
Segment breakdown not available.
