vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AURORA CANNABIS INC (ACB) and Namib Minerals (NAMM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AURORA CANNABIS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($81.6M vs $41.9M, roughly 1.9× Namib Minerals). Namib Minerals produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.4M vs $-8.6M).
Aurora Cannabis Inc. is a Canadian licensed cannabis producer, headquartered in Edmonton. It trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange and Nasdaq as ACB. As of September 2018, Aurora Cannabis had eight licensed production facilities, five sales licences, and operations in 25 countries. It had a funded capacity of over 625,000 kilograms of cannabis production per annum with the bulk of capacity based in Canada and a growing presence in international markets, particularly Denmark and Latin America. ...
Namib Minerals is a Namibia-based natural resources firm focused on exploration, development and extraction of high-demand mineral deposits including uranium, copper and lithium. It operates across licensed southern African sites, supplying raw materials to global clean energy, construction and electronics manufacturing sectors.
ACB vs NAMM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2024 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $81.6M | $41.9M |
| Net Profit | $-617.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | 8.7% | 45.7% |
| Operating Margin | -73.7% | 29.8% |
| Net Margin | -756.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.3M | $11.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.6M | $7.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -10.6% | 17.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.3% | 9.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | $-4.3M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | $-8.6M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | -10.6% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | 5.3% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
