vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of AECOM (ACM) and Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

AECOM is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.6B, roughly 1.4× Vertiv Holdings Co). Vertiv Holdings Co runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs 1.9%, a 12.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vertiv Holdings Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.1% vs 1.6%). Vertiv Holdings Co produced more free cash flow last quarter ($652.8M vs $41.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Vertiv Holdings Co's revenue compounded faster (16.5% CAGR vs -1.4%).

AECOM is an American multinational infrastructure consulting firm headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Vertiv is an American multinational provider of critical infrastructure and services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments.

ACM vs VRT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ACM
ACM
1.4× larger
ACM
$3.8B
$2.6B
VRT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
VRT
VRT
+28.6% gap
VRT
30.1%
1.6%
ACM
Higher net margin
VRT
VRT
12.8% more per $
VRT
14.7%
1.9%
ACM
More free cash flow
VRT
VRT
$610.9M more FCF
VRT
$652.8M
$41.9M
ACM
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
VRT
VRT
Annualised
VRT
16.5%
-1.4%
ACM

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Revenue
$3.8B
$2.6B
Net Profit
$74.5M
$390.1M
Gross Margin
7.3%
37.7%
Operating Margin
5.8%
Net Margin
1.9%
14.7%
Revenue YoY
1.6%
30.1%
Net Profit YoY
-48.0%
EPS (diluted)
$0.56
$0.99

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$3.8B
$2.6B
Q4 25
$2.9B
Q3 25
$4.2B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$4.2B
$2.6B
Q1 25
$3.8B
$2.0B
Q4 24
$4.0B
$2.3B
Q3 24
$4.1B
$2.1B
Q2 24
$4.2B
$2.0B
Net Profit
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$74.5M
$390.1M
Q4 25
$445.6M
Q3 25
$120.4M
$398.5M
Q2 25
$131.0M
$324.2M
Q1 25
$143.4M
$164.5M
Q4 24
$167.0M
$147.0M
Q3 24
$172.5M
$176.6M
Q2 24
$134.3M
$178.1M
Gross Margin
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
7.3%
37.7%
Q4 25
38.9%
Q3 25
7.9%
37.8%
Q2 25
7.8%
34.0%
Q1 25
7.7%
33.7%
Q4 24
6.7%
37.1%
Q3 24
7.2%
36.5%
Q2 24
6.9%
38.0%
Operating Margin
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
5.8%
Q4 25
20.1%
Q3 25
5.7%
19.3%
Q2 25
7.0%
16.8%
Q1 25
6.8%
14.3%
Q4 24
5.9%
19.5%
Q3 24
5.8%
17.9%
Q2 24
5.5%
17.2%
Net Margin
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
1.9%
14.7%
Q4 25
15.5%
Q3 25
2.9%
14.9%
Q2 25
3.1%
12.3%
Q1 25
3.8%
8.1%
Q4 24
4.2%
6.3%
Q3 24
4.2%
8.5%
Q2 24
3.2%
9.1%
EPS (diluted)
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$0.56
$0.99
Q4 25
$1.14
Q3 25
$0.90
$1.02
Q2 25
$0.98
$0.83
Q1 25
$1.08
$0.42
Q4 24
$1.25
$0.38
Q3 24
$1.27
$0.46
Q2 24
$0.98
$0.46

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.2B
$2.5B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.6B
$0
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.2B
$4.2B
Total Assets
$11.9B
$13.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.18×
0.00×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$1.2B
$2.5B
Q4 25
$1.7B
Q3 25
$1.6B
$1.4B
Q2 25
$1.8B
$1.6B
Q1 25
$1.6B
$1.5B
Q4 24
$1.6B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$1.6B
$908.7M
Q2 24
$1.6B
$579.7M
Total Debt
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$2.6B
$0
Q4 25
$2.9B
Q3 25
$2.6B
$2.9B
Q2 25
$2.5B
$2.9B
Q1 25
$2.5B
$2.9B
Q4 24
$2.5B
$2.9B
Q3 24
$2.5B
$2.9B
Q2 24
$2.5B
$2.9B
Stockholders' Equity
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$2.2B
$4.2B
Q4 25
$3.9B
Q3 25
$2.5B
$3.5B
Q2 25
$2.5B
$3.1B
Q1 25
$2.3B
$2.7B
Q4 24
$2.2B
$2.4B
Q3 24
$2.2B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$2.3B
$1.5B
Total Assets
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$11.9B
$13.4B
Q4 25
$12.2B
Q3 25
$12.2B
$10.8B
Q2 25
$12.3B
$10.4B
Q1 25
$11.8B
$9.5B
Q4 24
$11.8B
$9.1B
Q3 24
$12.1B
$8.9B
Q2 24
$12.0B
$8.1B
Debt / Equity
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
1.18×
0.00×
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
1.06×
0.83×
Q2 25
0.99×
0.93×
Q1 25
1.07×
1.10×
Q4 24
1.11×
1.20×
Q3 24
1.12×
1.62×
Q2 24
1.07×
1.91×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$70.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$41.9M
$652.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
1.1%
24.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.7%
4.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.94×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$616.0M
$2.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$70.2M
Q4 25
$978.9M
Q3 25
$196.1M
$508.7M
Q2 25
$283.7M
$322.9M
Q1 25
$190.7M
$303.3M
Q4 24
$151.1M
$425.2M
Q3 24
$298.8M
$378.2M
Q2 24
$291.3M
$378.4M
Free Cash Flow
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
$41.9M
$652.8M
Q4 25
$885.6M
Q3 25
$134.1M
$463.5M
Q2 25
$261.7M
$277.9M
Q1 25
$178.3M
$266.8M
Q4 24
$110.9M
$364.5M
Q3 24
$274.5M
$341.8M
Q2 24
$272.8M
$344.3M
FCF Margin
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
1.1%
24.6%
Q4 25
30.8%
Q3 25
3.2%
17.3%
Q2 25
6.3%
10.5%
Q1 25
4.7%
13.1%
Q4 24
2.8%
15.5%
Q3 24
6.7%
16.5%
Q2 24
6.6%
17.6%
Capex Intensity
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
0.7%
4.2%
Q4 25
3.2%
Q3 25
1.5%
1.7%
Q2 25
0.5%
1.7%
Q1 25
0.3%
1.8%
Q4 24
1.0%
2.6%
Q3 24
0.6%
1.8%
Q2 24
0.4%
1.7%
Cash Conversion
ACM
ACM
VRT
VRT
Q1 26
0.94×
Q4 25
2.20×
Q3 25
1.63×
1.28×
Q2 25
2.17×
1.00×
Q1 25
1.33×
1.84×
Q4 24
0.90×
2.89×
Q3 24
1.73×
2.14×
Q2 24
2.17×
2.12×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons