vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACME UNITED CORP (ACU) and LandBridge Co LLC (LB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LandBridge Co LLC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($56.8M vs $52.3M, roughly 1.1× ACME UNITED CORP). LandBridge Co LLC runs the higher net margin — 14.2% vs 1.9%, a 12.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LandBridge Co LLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (55.6% vs 13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, LandBridge Co LLC's revenue compounded faster (72.8% CAGR vs -2.9%).
Acme United Corporation is a supplier of cutting, measuring and safety products for the school, home, office, hardware and industrial markets. The company was organized as a partnership in 1867 and incorporated in 1873 under the laws of the State of Connecticut. It is publicly traded on the NYSE American with symbol ACU.
ACU vs LB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $52.3M | $56.8M |
| Net Profit | $985.0K | $8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 39.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 3.3% | 60.0% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 14.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | 55.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -40.4% | -83.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $52.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.5M | $56.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.1M | $50.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.0M | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.0M | $44.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.9M | $36.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.2M | $28.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.4M | $26.0M |
| Q1 26 | $985.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7M | $6.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7M | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $-57.7M |
| Q1 26 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 60.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.8% | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.3% | 57.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.0% | 49.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | -197.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.6% | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 135.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | -222.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.46 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.46 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.16 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.41 | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.54 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.09 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.2M | $30.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $33.0M | $570.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $116.7M | $340.3M |
| Total Assets | $195.2M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.28× | 1.68× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6M | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1M | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6M | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4M | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4M | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $24.6M |
| Q1 26 | $33.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $570.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $366.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $370.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $375.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $385.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $360.8M |
| Q1 26 | $116.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.6M | $340.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.8M | $272.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.7M | $266.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $108.3M | $217.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $107.0M | $211.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $106.3M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.0M | $296.4M |
| Q1 26 | $195.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $171.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $173.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $163.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $165.5M | $689.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.5M | $710.5M |
| Q1 26 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.49× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.22× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $126.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $122.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 214.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 7.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 15.68× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $207.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.2M | $126.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1M | $34.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $15.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4M | $67.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9M | $16.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | $122.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.0K | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $15.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7M | $66.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $15.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | 214.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 66.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 75.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.2% | 36.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 182.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.6% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 60.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.34× | 15.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.72× | 4.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.33× | 4.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.02× | 2.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.73× | 1.37× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.99× | 2.80× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.55× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.