vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Automatic Data Processing (ADP) and AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Automatic Data Processing is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.4B vs $104.4M, roughly 51.3× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). Automatic Data Processing runs the higher net margin — 19.8% vs -55.2%, a 75.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 6.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Automatic Data Processing's revenue compounded faster (1.0% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) is an American multinational provider of cloud-based human resources management, payroll processing, and professional employer organization (PEO) services, headquartered in Roseland, New Jersey.
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
ADP vs AP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.4B | $104.4M |
| Net Profit | $1.1B | $-57.7M |
| Gross Margin | 46.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 25.8% | -54.0% |
| Net Margin | 19.8% | -55.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.2% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.3% | -1958.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $-2.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $103.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $108.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $99.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $93.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $107.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $110.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $-57.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $910.7M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $963.2M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $956.3M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $829.3M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | 46.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.8% | -54.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.6% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.4% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | -55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | -6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.6% | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $-2.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.49 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.23 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.06 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.35 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.34 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.01 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.88 | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.5B | $10.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $117.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.4B | $32.6M |
| Total Assets | $84.6B | $495.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8B | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3B | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $117.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $115.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $115.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $116.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $119.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $116.2M |
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2B | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $58.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | $56.3M |
| Q4 25 | $84.6B | $495.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.3B | $524.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.4B | $537.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.4B | $536.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.1B | $530.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5B | $547.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.4B | $560.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.2B | $565.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-64.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -0.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-8.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $642.3M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $824.4M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-64.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.58× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.22× | -4.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.19× | 2.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.86× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.57× | -2.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.26× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ADP
| HCM | $2.2B | 42% |
| PEO Zero Margin Benefits Pass Throughs | $1.1B | 21% |
| HRO | $979.3M | 18% |
| Global | $709.3M | 13% |
| Interest On Funds Held For Clients | $308.6M | 6% |
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
