vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Allegion (ALLE) and AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Allegion is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $104.4M, roughly 9.9× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). Allegion runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs -55.2%, a 69.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 9.3%). Allegion produced more free cash flow last quarter ($200.5M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Allegion's revenue compounded faster (7.5% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Allegion plc manufactures and sells mechanical and electronic security products and solutions worldwide. The company offers door closers, controls, and exit devices; locks, locksets, portable locks, and key systems and services; electronic security products and access control systems; time, attendance, and workforce productivity systems; doors and door systems; and other accessories. The company sells its products and solutions to end-users in commercial, institutional, and residential facili...
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
ALLE vs AP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $104.4M |
| Net Profit | $147.5M | $-57.7M |
| Gross Margin | 44.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 20.3% | -54.0% |
| Net Margin | 14.3% | -55.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.3% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.4% | -1958.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.70 | $-2.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $103.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $108.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $941.9M | $99.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $945.6M | $93.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $967.1M | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $965.6M | $107.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $893.9M | $110.0M |
| Q4 25 | $147.5M | $-57.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.4M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.7M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.2M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $144.1M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.2M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.4M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.8M | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | 44.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.3% | -54.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.3% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | 14.3% | -55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.6% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | -6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | $1.70 | $-2.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.18 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.85 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.71 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.65 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.99 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.77 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.41 | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $356.2M | $10.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.0B | $117.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $32.6M |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $495.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.96× | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $356.2M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $302.7M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $656.8M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $494.5M | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $503.8M | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $878.9M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $747.5M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $391.8M | $10.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $117.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $115.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $115.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $116.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $119.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $116.2M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $58.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $56.3M |
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $495.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $524.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | $537.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $536.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $530.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $547.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $560.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3B | $565.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.96× | 3.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.07× | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | 1.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | 1.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.33× | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.53× | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.69× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.49× | 2.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $240.1M | $2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $200.5M | $-64.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.4% | -0.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.63× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $685.7M | $-8.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $240.1M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.5M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $209.7M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.5M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $219.0M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.9M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.0M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.1M | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | $200.5M | $-64.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $209.8M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $192.0M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.4M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.9M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $212.0M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $152.1M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.9M | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | 19.4% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.8% | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | -7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.8% | -7.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.71× | -4.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.52× | 2.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.11× | -2.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.41× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ALLE
| Products | $750.2M | 73% |
| Allegion International | $237.7M | 23% |
| Services | $45.2M | 4% |
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
