vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and GRACO INC (GGG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GRACO INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($593.2M vs $104.4M, roughly 5.7× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). GRACO INC runs the higher net margin — 22.3% vs -55.2%, a 77.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 8.1%). GRACO INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($184.3M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, GRACO INC's revenue compounded faster (9.8% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
Graco Inc. is an American industrial company that specializes in the development and manufacturing of fluid-handling systems and products. The company is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and markets its products to customers worldwide.
AP vs GGG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $593.2M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $132.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 51.7% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 26.7% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 22.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 21.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.78 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $593.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $543.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $571.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $528.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $548.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $519.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $553.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $492.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $132.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $137.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $127.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $124.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $108.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $122.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $133.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $122.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 51.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 53.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 52.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 52.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 50.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 53.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 54.1% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 27.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 29.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 27.0% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 25.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 22.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 23.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 24.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.78 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.82 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.76 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.71 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.77 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $624.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $624.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $618.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $534.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $536.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $675.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $764.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $666.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $622.7M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $196.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $184.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 31.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $637.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $179.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $182.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $125.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $185.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $178.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $139.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $118.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $184.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $175.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $163.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $114.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $171.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $159.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $102.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $81.7M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 31.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 32.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 31.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 1.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 1.70× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
GGG
| Industrial | $284.3M | 48% |
| Contractor | $265.5M | 45% |
| Other | $43.4M | 7% |
