vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Automatic Data Processing (ADP) and BRUNSWICK CORP (BC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Automatic Data Processing is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.4B vs $1.3B, roughly 4.0× BRUNSWICK CORP). Automatic Data Processing runs the higher net margin — 19.8% vs 1.4%, a 18.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BRUNSWICK CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.5% vs 6.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Automatic Data Processing's revenue compounded faster (1.0% CAGR vs -1.1%).
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) is an American multinational provider of cloud-based human resources management, payroll processing, and professional employer organization (PEO) services, headquartered in Roseland, New Jersey.
Brunswick Corporation, formerly known as the Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company, is an American corporation that has been developing, manufacturing and marketing a wide variety of products since 1845. Brunswick has more than 13,000 employees in 24 countries. Brunswick owns a number of brands, including Mercury Marine. In 2024, Brunswick reported sales of US$5.2 billion. Brunswick's global headquarters is in the northern Chicago suburb of Mettawa, Illinois.
ADP vs BC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.4B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $1.1B | $18.7M |
| Gross Margin | 46.1% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | 25.8% | 3.1% |
| Net Margin | 19.8% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.2% | 15.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.3% | 122.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $18.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $-235.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $910.7M | $59.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $963.2M | $-82.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $956.3M | $44.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $829.3M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $68.0M |
| Q4 25 | 46.1% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.2% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.1% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.7% | 24.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.7% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 26.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | 27.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.3% | 27.4% |
| Q4 25 | 25.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.3% | -17.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.0% | -4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.6% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.4% | 8.1% |
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.1% | -7.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.6% | 5.0% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $0.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.49 | $-3.59 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.23 | $0.89 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.06 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.35 | $-1.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.34 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.01 | $1.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.88 | $0.99 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.5B | $256.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.4B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $84.6B | $5.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $256.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $297.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8B | $315.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $286.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $269.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $284.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $494.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3B | $548.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $84.6B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.3B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.4B | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.4B | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.1B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5B | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.4B | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.2B | $6.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $132.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $83.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | 7.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $396.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $132.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $642.3M | $140.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $316.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $-27.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $306.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $824.4M | $67.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $211.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $-153.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $83.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $106.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $271.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-65.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $276.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $163.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-207.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -15.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | 7.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.58× | 5.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.22× | -1.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.86× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.57× | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.26× | -2.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ADP
| HCM | $2.2B | 42% |
| PEO Zero Margin Benefits Pass Throughs | $1.1B | 21% |
| HRO | $979.3M | 18% |
| Global | $709.3M | 13% |
| Interest On Funds Held For Clients | $308.6M | 6% |
BC
| Engine Partsand Accessories | $532.4M | 40% |
| Navico Group | $452.9M | 34% |
| Recreational Fiberglass Boats | $111.6M | 8% |
| Saltwater Fishing Boats | $85.7M | 6% |
| Controls Riggingand Propellers | $78.3M | 6% |
| Business Acceleration | $48.1M | 4% |
| Sterndrive Engine | $32.6M | 2% |