vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Automatic Data Processing (ADP) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Automatic Data Processing is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.4B vs $1.1B, roughly 5.0× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). Automatic Data Processing runs the higher net margin — 19.8% vs 5.0%, a 14.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Automatic Data Processing posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.2% vs -2.5%). Over the past eight quarters, CHART INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.6% CAGR vs 1.0%).
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) is an American multinational provider of cloud-based human resources management, payroll processing, and professional employer organization (PEO) services, headquartered in Roseland, New Jersey.
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
ADP vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.4B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $1.1B | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | 46.1% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 25.8% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 19.8% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.2% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.3% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.62 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3B | $950.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $910.7M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $963.2M | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $956.3M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $829.3M | $58.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $11.3M |
| Q4 25 | 46.1% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.2% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.1% | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.7% | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.7% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.3% | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | 25.8% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.3% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.2% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.0% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.6% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 29.4% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.1% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.4% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.6% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $2.62 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.49 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.23 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.06 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.35 | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.34 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.01 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.88 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.5B | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.4B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $84.6B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8B | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $247.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3B | $191.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.6B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | $84.6B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.3B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.4B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.4B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.1B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.4B | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.2B | $9.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.07× | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $642.3M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $824.4M | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $116.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $-95.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $88.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-141.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.58× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.22× | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.19× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.86× | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.57× | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.26× | -8.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ADP
| HCM | $2.2B | 42% |
| PEO Zero Margin Benefits Pass Throughs | $1.1B | 21% |
| HRO | $979.3M | 18% |
| Global | $709.3M | 13% |
| Interest On Funds Held For Clients | $308.6M | 6% |
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |
