vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ametek (AME) and CHART INDUSTRIES INC (GTLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ametek is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.9× CHART INDUSTRIES INC). Ametek runs the higher net margin — 19.9% vs 5.0%, a 15.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ametek posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.4% vs -2.5%). Ametek produced more free cash flow last quarter ($527.3M vs $66.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Ametek's revenue compounded faster (7.3% CAGR vs 6.6%).
AMETEK, Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate and global designer and manufacturer of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices with headquarters in the United States and over 150 sites worldwide.
Oricon Inc. , established in 1999, is the holding company at the head of a Japanese corporate group that supplies statistics and information on music and the music industry in Japan and Western music. It started as Original Confidence Inc. , which was founded by Sōkō Koike in November 1967 and became known for its music charts. Oricon Inc. was originally set up as a subsidiary of Original Confidence and took over the latter's Oricon record charts in April 2002.
AME vs GTLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $398.6M | $53.6M |
| Gross Margin | 36.0% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 25.3% | 11.6% |
| Net Margin | 19.9% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.4% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.9% | -32.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.73 | $1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $950.7M |
| Q4 25 | $398.6M | $53.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $371.4M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $76.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $351.8M | $49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.3M | $79.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $340.2M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.7M | $58.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $310.9M | $11.3M |
| Q4 25 | 36.0% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.3% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.8% | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | 33.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.6% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.0% | 34.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 36.0% | 33.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.1% | 31.8% |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.0% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.3% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.6% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.8% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.0% | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.9% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $1.73 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.60 | $-3.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.55 | $1.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.52 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.67 | $1.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.47 | $1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.45 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.34 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $458.0M | $366.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3B | $3.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.6B | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $16.1B | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | 1.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $458.0M | $366.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $439.2M | $399.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $619.7M | $342.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $399.0M | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $374.0M | $308.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.3M | $310.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.6M | $247.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $373.8M | $191.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.6B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.6B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | $16.1B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.3B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9B | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.6B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.8B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.9B | $9.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | 1.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.22× | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $584.3M | $88.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $527.3M | $66.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.4% | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.47× | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.7B | $202.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $584.3M | $88.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $440.9M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $359.1M | $145.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $417.5M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $550.0M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $487.2M | $200.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $381.4M | $116.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $410.2M | $-95.1M |
| Q4 25 | $527.3M | $66.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $420.0M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $329.8M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $394.5M | $-80.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $498.3M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $460.9M | $174.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.0M | $88.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $382.6M | $-141.2M |
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.2% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | -8.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.3% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | 16.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.0% | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.47× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | -1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.42× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.43× | 2.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.13× | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.32× | -8.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AME
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.1B | 54% |
| Electronic Instruments Group | $620.1M | 31% |
| Transferred Over Time | $294.6M | 15% |
GTLS
| Repair Service And Leasing Segment | $330.4M | 31% |
| Heat Transfer Systems Segment | $325.8M | 30% |
| Specialty Products Segment | $259.5M | 24% |
| Transferred Over Time | $94.4M | 9% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $69.5M | 6% |