vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ameren (AEE) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ameren is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.4× Gen Digital). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 14.2%, a 1.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs -8.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs -0.9%).
Ameren Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a public utility holding company in the United States. It operates through four segments: Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Transmission. The company engages in the rate-regulated electric generation, transmission, and distribution activities; and rate-regulated natural gas distribution and transmission businesses. It primarily generates electricity through coal, nucle...
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
AEE vs GEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $253.0M | $192.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | 20.2% | 34.9% |
| Net Margin | 14.2% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | 28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.6% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.92 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $986.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $974.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $965.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $253.0M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $641.0M | $135.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.0M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.0M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $457.0M | $161.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.0M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 80.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.5% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | 43.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.2% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.7% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.92 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.35 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.07 | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.70 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.97 | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $19.4B | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.4B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $48.5B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.45× | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $883.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.0M | $644.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.4B | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.8B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $48.5B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.4B | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.6B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.3B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.3B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.45× | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.47× | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.33× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $956.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-54.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 56.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.78× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-775.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $956.0M | $541.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $862.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $473.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $817.0M | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $897.0M | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $557.0M | $264.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-54.0M | $535.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.0M | $405.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-204.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-633.0M | $470.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-473.0M | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-240.0M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-445.0M | $262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.0% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.4% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.0% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.3% | 27.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 56.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.2% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.78× | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 3.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.11× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.49× | 3.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.93× | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.96× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AEE
Segment breakdown not available.
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
