vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. (ENR) and Gen Digital (GEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gen Digital is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $778.9M, roughly 1.6× ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.). Gen Digital runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs -0.4%, a 15.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Gen Digital posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.5% vs 6.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Gen Digital's revenue compounded faster (13.2% CAGR vs 8.4%).
Energizer Holdings, Inc. is an American manufacturer and one of the world's largest manufacturers of batteries, headquartered in Clayton, Missouri. It produces batteries under the Energizer, Ray-O-Vac, Varta, and Eveready brand names and formerly owned several personal care businesses until it separated that side of the business into a new company called Edgewell Personal Care in 2015.
Gen Digital Inc. is a multinational software company co-headquartered in both Tempe, Arizona (USA) and Prague, Czech Republic (EU). The company provides cybersecurity software, financial technology, and services. Gen is a Fortune 500 company and a member of the S&P 500 stock-market index. It is listed at both NASDAQ and Prague Stock Exchange. Its portfolio includes Norton, Avast, LifeLock, Avira, AVG, ReputationDefender, MoneyLion and CCleaner.
ENR vs GEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $778.9M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $-3.4M | $192.0M |
| Gross Margin | 32.9% | 78.4% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 34.9% |
| Net Margin | -0.4% | 15.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.5% | 28.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -115.2% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $778.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $832.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $725.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $662.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $731.7M | $986.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $805.7M | $974.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $701.4M | $965.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $192.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.9M | $135.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $153.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.3M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.6M | $161.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.8M | $181.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.9% | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.1% | 80.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.8% | 80.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.1% | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.5% | 80.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.6% | 35.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.4% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | 43.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.4% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.9% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $214.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $141.3M | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $15.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $214.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $236.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $171.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $195.9M | $883.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $216.9M | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $146.7M | $644.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $8.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.2B | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $8.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $141.3M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.9M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $183.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.9M | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $140.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.4M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $16.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $16.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3B | $15.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $15.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.28× | 3.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.57× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.56× | 3.64× | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.17× | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.51× | 4.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.04× | 4.33× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $149.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $124.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 15.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $145.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $149.5M | $541.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.5M | $409.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $473.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $77.0M | $326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $168.9M | $158.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.8M | $264.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | $535.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.7M | $405.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-33.8M | $470.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.4M | $318.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $141.5M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.3M | $262.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.9% | 43.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 32.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | 46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.8% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.6% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 27.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.76× | 3.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.14× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.45× | 3.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.45× | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.55× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.46× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ENR
| Alkaline Batteries | $666.5M | 86% |
| Auto Care | $93.7M | 12% |
| Lights | $18.7M | 2% |
GEN
| Cyber Safety Platform | $819.0M | 66% |
| Trust Based Solutions | $421.0M | 34% |
| Net Interest Income On Notes Receivable | $4.0M | 0% |
