vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ameren (AEE) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ameren is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.0× Take-Two Interactive). Ameren runs the higher net margin — 14.2% vs -5.5%, a 19.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Take-Two Interactive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.9% vs -8.2%). Take-Two Interactive produced more free cash flow last quarter ($236.2M vs $-54.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Take-Two Interactive's revenue compounded faster (10.2% CAGR vs -0.9%).
Ameren Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a public utility holding company in the United States. It operates through four segments: Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Transmission. The company engages in the rate-regulated electric generation, transmission, and distribution activities; and rate-regulated natural gas distribution and transmission businesses. It primarily generates electricity through coal, nucle...
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
AEE vs TTWO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $253.0M | $-92.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 20.2% | -2.3% |
| Net Margin | 14.2% | -5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.2% | 24.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 21.6% | 25.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.92 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $253.0M | $-92.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $641.0M | $-133.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $277.0M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $290.0M | $-3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.0M | $-125.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $457.0M | $-365.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.0M | $-262.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $262.0M | $-2.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 62.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 53.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 57.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.5% |
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.6% | -5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.5% | -238.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.2% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.0% | -22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | -13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | -193.9% |
| Q4 25 | 14.2% | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.7% | -7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.5% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | -235.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | -27.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.4% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.4% | -207.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.92 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.35 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.07 | $-21.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.70 | $-2.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.97 | $-1.52 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | $-17.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.0M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $19.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.4B | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | $48.5B | $10.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.45× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.0M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $879.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.0M | $776.0M |
| Q4 25 | $19.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.1B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.4B | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | $48.5B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.4B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.6B | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7B | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.6B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.3B | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.3B | $12.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $41.3B | $12.2B |
| Q4 25 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $956.0M | $305.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-54.0M | $236.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.0% | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 56.7% | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.78× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-775.0M | $487.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $956.0M | $305.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $128.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $862.0M | $-44.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $279.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $817.0M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $897.0M | $-128.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $557.0M | $-191.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $492.0M | $-8.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-54.0M | $236.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.0M | $96.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-204.0M | $-69.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-633.0M | $224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-473.0M | $-48.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-240.0M | $-165.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-445.0M | $-226.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-398.0M | $-55.1M |
| Q4 25 | -3.0% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.3% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.2% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.2% | 14.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.4% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.0% | -12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -26.3% | -16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.9% | -3.9% |
| Q4 25 | 56.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.3% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.0% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.78× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.11× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.93× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.88× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
