vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Alset Inc. (AEI) and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. (BPYPP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.3M, roughly 1381.1× Alset Inc.). Brookfield Property Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — -2.6% vs -2481.1%, a 2478.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Property Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-25.6% vs -85.4%).
Alset Global GmbH is an Austrian technology and engineering company based in Graz that specialises in hydrogen-based clean mobility products. Alset Global is known for developing a Hybrid Hydrogen internal combustion engine that can run on either pure petrol, pure hydrogen or a combination of both. This technology offers a sustainable and clean alternative to petrol-based internal combustion engines. The technology has been developed to create an alternative technology to meet new emission ta...
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. is a limited partnership that owns office buildings and shopping centers/shopping malls, as well as minority limited partner interests in investment funds sponsored by affiliates that invest in other types of commercial property. It is headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda.
AEI vs BPYPP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3M | $1.8B |
| Net Profit | $-32.4M | $-46.0M |
| Gross Margin | 35.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -451.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -2481.1% | -2.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -85.4% | -25.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1491.5% | 94.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.78 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $998.8K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-32.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.2M | $-46.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.2M | $-789.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 35.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -451.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -258.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -250.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -368.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -249.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -37.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -2481.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 151.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -748.1% | -2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -780.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -109.9% | -32.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -111.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.78 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.71 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.78 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.73 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.2M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $121.1M | $40.2B |
| Total Assets | $136.6M | $98.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $25.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $116.5K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.1K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.9K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $137.8K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.8K | — |
| Q4 25 | $121.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.8M | $40.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.4M | $48.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $136.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.0M | $98.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $90.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $98.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $132.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $96.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-436.1K | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-466.5K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -35.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-6.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-436.1K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $883.4K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-466.5K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $822.4K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | -35.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -245.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -357.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 155.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -58.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -392.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.98× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.66× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
