vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Alset Inc. (AEI) and Urban Edge Properties (UE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Urban Edge Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($119.6M vs $1.3M, roughly 91.6× Alset Inc.). Urban Edge Properties runs the higher net margin — 10.4% vs -2481.1%, a 2491.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Urban Edge Properties posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs -85.4%). Urban Edge Properties produced more free cash flow last quarter ($24.2M vs $-466.5K). Over the past eight quarters, Urban Edge Properties's revenue compounded faster (4.4% CAGR vs -53.7%).
Alset Global GmbH is an Austrian technology and engineering company based in Graz that specialises in hydrogen-based clean mobility products. Alset Global is known for developing a Hybrid Hydrogen internal combustion engine that can run on either pure petrol, pure hydrogen or a combination of both. This technology offers a sustainable and clean alternative to petrol-based internal combustion engines. The technology has been developed to create an alternative technology to meet new emission ta...
Urban Edge Properties is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and develops high-quality retail and mixed-use properties, primarily located in densely populated urban and suburban markets across the United States. Its portfolio covers grocery-anchored shopping centers, lifestyle outlets, and community-focused commercial assets.
AEI vs UE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3M | $119.6M |
| Net Profit | $-32.4M | $12.4M |
| Gross Margin | 35.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -451.0% | 11.3% |
| Net Margin | -2481.1% | 10.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -85.4% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1491.5% | -58.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.78 | $0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3M | $119.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $998.8K | $120.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1M | $114.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0M | $112.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $106.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1M | $109.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-32.4M | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.2M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.3M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.2M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.8M | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | 35.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -451.0% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -258.2% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -250.7% | 53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -368.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -249.3% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -37.2% | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | -2481.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 151.4% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -748.1% | 50.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -780.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.6% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -109.9% | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -111.2% | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.78 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.71 | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.78 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.24 | $0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.73 | $0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $25.2M | $48.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $121.1M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $136.6M | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $25.2M | $48.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.5M | $77.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.2M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.2M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $67.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | $78.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.7M | $67.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $116.5K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $123.1K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.9K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $137.8K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.8K | — |
| Q4 25 | $121.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $81.7M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $136.6M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $169.1M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $90.5M | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.8M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $98.8M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.5M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $96.7M | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-436.1K | $51.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-466.5K | $24.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -35.8% | 20.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 22.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-6.2M | $81.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-436.1K | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $883.4K | $55.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.6M | $43.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.8M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9M | $52.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | $22.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-466.5K | $24.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $822.4K | $26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.8M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9M | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.9M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | $19.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | $2.7M |
| Q4 25 | -35.8% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 82.3% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -245.9% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -357.3% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 155.1% | 6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -58.2% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -392.3% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.8% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.6% | 20.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 20.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 18.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.58× | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.98× | 1.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.66× | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.