vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AGENUS INC (AGEN) and Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $34.2M, roughly 1.4× AGENUS INC). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -31.0%, a 38.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AGENUS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.5% vs 13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs 10.5%).
Agenus Inc. is a Lexington, Massachusetts-based biotechnology company focused on immunotherapy including immuno-oncology, a field that uses the immune system to control or cure cancer. The company is developing checkpoint modulators (CPMs), patient-specific anti-cancer vaccines, and adjuvants designed for use with various vaccines. CPM development is a particularly fast-moving field, since early products have produced unprecedented clinical benefits for patients.
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
AGEN vs CMCL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $34.2M | $46.9M |
| Net Profit | $-10.6M | $3.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | 42.1% | 18.6% |
| Net Margin | -31.0% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 27.5% | 13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 77.3% | -33.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.09 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $25.1M | $46.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.5M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $28.0M | $38.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-10.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-26.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-67.2M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-54.8M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-63.5M | $2.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 97.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 99.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 99.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 99.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 99.4% | 41.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 99.5% | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 99.6% | 35.9% |
| Q4 25 | 42.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -15.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -65.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -55.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -96.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -125.5% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -128.4% | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -117.4% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | -31.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 211.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -116.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -109.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -174.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -267.7% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -233.1% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -226.6% | 5.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.94 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.00 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.95 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.08 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.52 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.04 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0M | $7.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $44.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-271.1M | $231.0M |
| Total Assets | $226.8M | $339.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.8M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.7M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.9M | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | $44.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-271.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-274.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-354.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-341.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-326.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-292.3M | $231.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-241.3M | $231.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-201.4M | $220.3M |
| Q4 25 | $226.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $233.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $185.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $200.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $226.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.5M | $339.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.4M | $338.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $256.6M | $321.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-16.6M | $4.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-16.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-25.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-28.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-53.3M | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-38.2M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-38.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-25.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-28.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-53.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-38.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-38.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -78.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -106.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -107.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -212.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -164.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -136.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AGEN
| Non Cash Royalty Revenue | $31.1M | 91% |
| Other | $3.2M | 9% |
CMCL
Segment breakdown not available.
