vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ABUNDIA GLOBAL IMPACT GROUP, INC. (AGIG) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ABUNDIA GLOBAL IMPACT GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — 22251.6% vs -43.2%, a 22294.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Diamondback Energy posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-9.0% vs -116.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Diamondback Energy's revenue compounded faster (NaN% CAGR vs NaN%).
Diamondback Energy, headquartered in Midland, Texas, is an American company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Permian Basin.
AGIG vs FANG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $-27.9K | $3.4B |
| Net Profit | $-6.2M | $-1.5B |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 20546.5% | -82.4% |
| Net Margin | 22251.6% | -43.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -116.8% | -9.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -273.1% | -235.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.88 | $-4.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $-27.9K | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $225.7K | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.6K | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.3K | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.4K | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.2K | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.8K | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $147.7K | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $-6.2M | $-1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.8M | $699.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-281.8K | $659.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $396.7K | $837.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.1M | $768.0M |
| Q4 25 | 20546.5% | -82.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8915.6% | 31.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1648.5% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1037.7% | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4016.7% | 38.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -418.2% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -354.3% | 46.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -276.3% | 50.2% |
| Q4 25 | 22251.6% | -43.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9042.1% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1623.5% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1008.8% | 34.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1001.5% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -216.4% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 342.6% | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1392.4% | 34.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.88 | $-4.99 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.60 | $3.51 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.11 | $2.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $4.83 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.02 | $3.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | $3.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | $4.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $4.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.6M | $104.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $10.2M | $13.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $19.0M | $37.0B |
| Total Assets | $31.9M | $71.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.54× | 0.37× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.6M | $104.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $159.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $219.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $525.8K | $161.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $370.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $896.0M |
| Q4 25 | $10.2M | $13.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.6B |
| Q4 25 | $19.0M | $37.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3M | $39.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4M | $38.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $38.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.1M | $37.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.8M | $37.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $17.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.0M | $16.9B |
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | $71.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.8M | $76.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7M | $71.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.2M | $70.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | $67.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | $65.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4M | $35.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | $29.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.54× | 0.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.39× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.4M | $2.3B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.4M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.3M | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-552.1K | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.0K | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $122.8K | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.83× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.09× | 1.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.74× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AGIG
Segment breakdown not available.
FANG
| Oil Explorationand Production | $2.7B | 81% |
| Oil Purchased | $308.0M | 9% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Production | $293.0M | 9% |
| Natural Gas Production | $4.0M | 0% |
