vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) and MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP (MATW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($284.8M vs $206.0M, roughly 1.4× AGNC Investment Corp.). AGNC Investment Corp. runs the higher net margin — 463.1% vs 15.3%, a 447.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AGNC Investment Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (79.1% vs -29.1%).
The Russell 1000 Index is a U.S. stock market index that tracks the largest 1,000 stocks in the Russell 3000 Index, which represent about 93% of the total market capitalization of that index. The index is market cap weighted, meaning larger companies have a greater influence on the index than smaller companies.
Matthews Aurora Funeral Solutions is one of the largest manufacturers of caskets and funerary urns in the United States, selling over 38% of the country's caskets as of 2005. The Aurora, Indiana–based company is a subsidiary of Pittsburgh-based Matthews International. The company makes both wooden and metal caskets and urns for holding cremated remains. It also provides supplies and consulting services for funeral homes.
AGNC vs MATW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $206.0M | $284.8M |
| Net Profit | $954.0M | $43.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 34.2% |
| Net Margin | 463.1% | 15.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 79.1% | -29.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 682.0% | 1356.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.90 | $1.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $206.0M | $284.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $162.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-64.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-30.0M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $177.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $954.0M | $43.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $806.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-140.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-48.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $443.0M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-666.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 34.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 463.1% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 544.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -86.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -540.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1600.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1476.7% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -376.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.90 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.39 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.59 | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-1.31 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $450.0M | $31.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $529.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $12.4B | $543.2M |
| Total Assets | $115.1B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.98× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $450.0M | $31.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $450.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $656.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $455.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $507.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $530.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $505.0M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $976.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $529.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $12.4B | $543.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.6B | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $7.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $115.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $71.9B | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $58.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $653.0M | $-52.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-57.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -20.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.68× | -1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $653.0M | $-52.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $153.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $180.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $192.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-20.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.0M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $226.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-57.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.68× | -1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.84× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.02× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
