vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Healthcare REIT, Inc. (AHR) and ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
American Healthcare REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($564.0M vs $321.2M, roughly 1.8× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs 1.9%, a 2.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, American Healthcare REIT, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.5% vs 12.0%). Over the past eight quarters, American Healthcare REIT, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.7% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (MPT) is an international real estate investment trust (REIT) based in Birmingham, Alabama that purchases and invests in healthcare facilities and for-profit healthcare holding companies, primarily in the United States and Europe. Their property acquisitions often come in the form of sale-leaseback agreements, in which the original property owner sells the property to MPT and becomes their tenant. MPT's tenants are generally subject to long-term triple net lease...
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
AHR vs AIN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $564.0M | $321.2M |
| Net Profit | $10.8M | $13.9M |
| Gross Margin | 14.8% | 31.1% |
| Operating Margin | 19.8% | 9.3% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.5% | 12.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 133.9% | -21.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $564.0M | $321.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $532.1M | $261.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $501.3M | $311.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $497.2M | $288.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $496.8M | $286.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $476.8M | $298.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $458.0M | $332.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $452.1M | $313.3M |
| Q4 25 | $10.8M | $13.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.9M | $-97.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | $17.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.8M | $17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.1M | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.9M | $27.3M |
| Q4 25 | 14.8% | 31.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | -19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | 33.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.3% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.5% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | 34.7% |
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.9% | -44.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.6% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.6% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.2% | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.5% | -37.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.4% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.9% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.9% | 8.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | $0.56 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $-3.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.04 | $0.56 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.23 | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $0.57 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $0.79 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.04 | $0.87 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $114.8M | $112.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $455.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.3B | $726.2M |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $114.8M | $112.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.4M | $108.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.5M | $106.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.1M | $119.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $76.7M | $115.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.8M | $127.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.1M | $116.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $77.0M | $125.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $455.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $480.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $444.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $416.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $318.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $362.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $377.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $439.1M |
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $726.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $739.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $888.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $900.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $943.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $991.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $967.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | $967.5M |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.45× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $55.2M | $73.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $51.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 16.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 6.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.12× | 5.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $82.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $55.2M | $73.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.2M | $43.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.5M | $32.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $60.6M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.5M | $78.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.1M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.4M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | $9.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $18.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-13.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $60.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $31.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $63.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-17.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -5.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | 5.12× | 5.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.21× | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.02× | 3.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AHR
| Integrated Senior Health Campuses | $467.0M | 83% |
| SHOP | $97.0M | 17% |
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
