vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $224.2M, roughly 1.4× STAG Industrial, Inc.). STAG Industrial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.6% vs 4.3%, a 23.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 9.1%). Over the past eight quarters, STAG Industrial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.7% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Stag Arms is a firearms manufacturer founded in May 2003 and located in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Stag Arms is a manufacturer of the AR-15 type rifle, marketed as Stag-15 rifles. Stag advertises that all their weapons and accessories are made in the United States. They are best known for their left-handed AR-15 rifles, which use a mirror imaged upper receiver and have the ejection port reversed for left-handed shooters and the safety selector control on the right side of the lower receiver.
AIN vs STAG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $224.2M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $62.0M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 27.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $224.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $220.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $207.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $205.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $199.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $190.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $189.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $83.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $41.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $59.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 37.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 44.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 31.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $8.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $7.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $36.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $33.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $6.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | 0.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | 0.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | 0.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | 0.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | 0.84× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $104.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $143.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $111.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $103.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $128.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $122.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $62.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $57.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $37.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $86.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $105.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 27.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 9.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 1.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 2.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 1.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 2.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
STAG
Segment breakdown not available.
