vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST INC (AHT) and USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC (USNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($259.0M vs $250.2M, roughly 1.0× USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC). USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC runs the higher net margin — 3.0% vs -26.8%, a 29.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-3.0% vs -6.0%). Over the past eight quarters, USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC's revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs -7.7%).
Ashford Hospitality Trust Inc is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust focused on upper-upscale full-service hotel properties across key U.S. urban, suburban and resort markets. Its portfolio holds assets under top global hospitality brands, serving business and leisure travelers, with a focus on long-term value growth and stable shareholder returns.
Usana Health Sciences, Inc., or USANA, is an American multi-level marketing company based in Salt Lake City, Utah. As of 2021, Usana was the 14th largest direct-selling company in the world by revenue. The company manufactures most of its nutritional products, dietary supplements, and skincare products at a Salt Lake City facility. Its products are sold in 24 countries via a network of independent distributors.
AHT vs USNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $259.0M | $250.2M |
| Net Profit | $-69.3M | $7.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | -2.6% | 5.5% |
| Net Margin | -26.8% | 3.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -6.0% | -3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 44.2% | -20.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-12.85 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $250.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $259.0M | $226.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $266.1M | $213.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $302.0M | $235.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.4M | $249.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $275.5M | $213.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $276.6M | $200.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $316.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-69.3M | $180.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-60.1M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-30.4M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-20.0M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-124.2M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-57.9M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 76.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 79.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 82.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 80.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.3% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 42.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -26.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.6% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -45.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.85 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.35 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.88 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.91 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.64 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.39 | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.50 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $66.1M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-626.4M | — |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $739.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $66.1M | $158.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.9M | $145.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.0M | $151.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $85.8M | $179.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $112.9M | $181.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.7M | $364.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $121.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-626.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-548.7M | $528.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-485.5M | $531.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-446.1M | $529.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-419.2M | $532.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-288.4M | $533.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-225.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $739.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $742.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $726.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $734.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $746.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.2B | $748.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $671.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-15.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-86.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -33.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 27.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-135.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-15.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.3M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-25.0M | $15.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-23.6M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $795.0K | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-86.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-226.0K | $-5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.6M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-44.8M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-131.6M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-21.8M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-22.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -33.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.1% | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.2% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -47.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.9% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.16× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AHT
| Occupancy | $190.2M | 73% |
| Food And Beverage | $51.8M | 20% |
| Hotel Other | $16.6M | 6% |
USNA
Segment breakdown not available.
