vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CENTURY ALUMINUM CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($633.7M vs $321.2M, roughly 2.0× ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP). ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 4.3% vs 0.3%, a 4.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs 0.4%). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($67.7M vs $51.4M). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
AIN vs CENX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $633.7M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 13.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 5.2% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | -96.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $633.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $632.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $628.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $633.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $630.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $539.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $560.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $489.5M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $29.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $45.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $246.8M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | -0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 50.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $2.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | $134.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $805.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | $134.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $40.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | $44.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $32.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | $41.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | $93.5M |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $805.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $741.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $724.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $726.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $694.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $628.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $601.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $601.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $102.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $67.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 10.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 57.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $84.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $102.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $72.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $-41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $-14.8M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $67.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $-18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $51.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $-54.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | $-44.5M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | -9.1% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 57.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 2.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | -0.92× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | -0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
