vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP (AIN) and Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($321.2M vs $312.4M, roughly 1.0× Essent Group Ltd.). Essent Group Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 49.6% vs 4.3%, a 45.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.0% vs -0.8%). Essent Group Ltd. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($848.7M vs $51.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Essent Group Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (2.3% CAGR vs 1.2%).
Albany International Corp is a global advanced materials and industrial technology company. It operates two core segments: Machine Clothing producing custom engineered fabrics for paper and other industrial manufacturing processes, and Engineered Composites developing high-performance composite components primarily for the aerospace and defense sectors, serving customers across North America, Europe, Asia and other global regions.
Essentra PLC is a supplier of plastic and fibre products. The company operates internationally from headquarters in Kidlington, Oxfordshire. It is listed on the London Stock Exchange.
AIN vs ESNT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $321.2M | $312.4M |
| Net Profit | $13.9M | $155.0M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | 59.1% |
| Net Margin | 4.3% | 49.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.0% | -0.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.5% | -7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.56 | $1.61 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | $312.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.4M | $311.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.4M | $319.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.8M | $317.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.9M | $315.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.4M | $316.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.0M | $312.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.3M | $298.4M |
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $155.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-97.8M | $164.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.2M | $195.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $175.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.7M | $167.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.0M | $176.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.6M | $203.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.3M | $181.7M |
| Q4 25 | 31.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -19.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 59.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -44.6% | 63.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 72.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 65.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 61.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.4% | 65.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.9% | 76.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.4% | 71.6% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 49.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.4% | 52.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 55.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.2% | 53.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 55.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 65.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 60.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.56 | $1.61 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.37 | $1.67 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $1.93 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $1.69 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.57 | $1.59 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.57 | $1.65 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $1.91 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | $1.70 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $455.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $726.2M | $5.8B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $7.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.63× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $112.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $455.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $480.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $444.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $416.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $318.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $362.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $726.2M | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $739.3M | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.6M | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0M | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $943.5M | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $991.0M | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $967.5M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $967.5M | $5.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $6.6B |
| Q4 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.45× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $73.7M | $856.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $51.4M | $848.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | 271.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.9% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.31× | 5.52× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.6M | $1.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $73.7M | $856.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.9M | $215.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.7M | $189.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1M | $221.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.5M | $861.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.0M | $229.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $188.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6M | $216.9M |
| Q4 25 | $51.4M | $848.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | $210.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.8M | $188.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $221.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $854.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $228.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.6M | $187.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.3M | $212.5M |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 271.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 67.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.0% | 59.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 69.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.0% | 271.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 72.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.5% | 71.2% |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.31× | 5.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.56× | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.12× | 1.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.44× | 5.13× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.61× | 1.30× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.39× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 1.19× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AIN
| Transferred At Point In Time | $176.5M | 55% |
| Engineered Composites Other | $99.3M | 31% |
| Engineered Composites ASC | $44.5M | 14% |
| Transferred Over Time | $1.0M | 0% |
ESNT
| Mortgage Insurance Segment | $192.4M | 62% |
| Other | $120.0M | 38% |
